» Articles » PMID: 37962077

Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Abstract

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis is a rare, chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by the destruction of interlobular bile ducts, leading to cholestasis and liver fibrosis. Whether elafibranor, an oral, dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and δ agonist, may have benefit as a treatment for primary biliary cholangitis is unknown.

Methods: In this multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with primary biliary cholangitis who had had an inadequate response to or unacceptable side effects with ursodeoxycholic acid to receive once-daily elafibranor, at a dose of 80 mg, or placebo. The primary end point was a biochemical response (defined as an alkaline phosphatase level of <1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a reduction of ≥15% from baseline, and normal total bilirubin levels) at week 52. Key secondary end points were normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level at week 52 and a change in pruritus intensity from baseline through week 52 and through week 24, as measured on the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]).

Results: A total of 161 patients underwent randomization. A biochemical response (the primary end point) was observed in 51% of the patients (55 of 108) who received elafibranor and in 4% (2 of 53) who received placebo, for a difference of 47 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 57; P<0.001). The alkaline phosphatase level normalized in 15% of the patients in the elafibranor group and in none of the patients in the placebo group at week 52 (difference, 15 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 23; P = 0.002). Among patients who had moderate-to-severe pruritus (44 patients in the elafibranor group and 22 in the placebo group), the least-squares mean change from baseline through week 52 on the WI-NRS did not differ significantly between the groups (-1.93 vs. -1.15; difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.99 to 0.42; P = 0.20). Adverse events that occurred more frequently with elafibranor than with placebo included abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.

Conclusions: Treatment with elafibranor resulted in significantly greater improvements in relevant biochemical indicators of cholestasis than placebo. (Funded by GENFIT and Ipsen; ELATIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04526665.).

Citing Articles

Primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Manns M, Bergquist A, Karlsen T, Levy C, Muir A, Ponsioen C Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025; 11(1):17.

PMID: 40082445 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-025-00600-x.


Therapeutic potential of elafibranor in alcohol-associated liver disease: Insights into macrophage modulation and fibrosis reduction.

Farhadi S, Mohammadi S, AlKindi A, Al-Amri I World J Biol Chem. 2025; 16(1):104535.

PMID: 40070853 PMC: 11891553. DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v16.i1.104535.


Naringenin cationic lipid-modified nanoparticles mitigate MASLD progression by modulating lipid homeostasis and gut microbiota.

Dong L, Lou W, Xu C, Wang J J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):168.

PMID: 40038718 PMC: 11881431. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03228-x.


Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.

Ghabril M, Vuppalanchi R, Chalasani N Liver Int. 2025; 45(3):e70019.

PMID: 39927421 PMC: 11808633. DOI: 10.1111/liv.70019.


Metabolism of hepatic stellate cells in chronic liver diseases: emerging molecular and therapeutic interventions.

Yan M, Cui Y, Xiang Q Theranostics. 2025; 15(5):1715-1740.

PMID: 39897543 PMC: 11780521. DOI: 10.7150/thno.106597.