Leveraging Machine Learning Models for Peptide-Protein Interaction Prediction

Overview

Journal ArXiv

Date 2023 Nov 14

PMID 37961736

Authors

Song Yin

Xuenan Mi

Diwakar Shukla

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Peptides play a pivotal role in a wide range of biological activities through participating in up to 40% protein-protein interactions in cellular processes. They also demonstrate remarkable specificity and efficacy, making them promising candidates for drug development. However, predicting peptide-protein complexes by traditional computational approaches, such as Docking and Molecular Dynamics simulations, still remains a challenge due to high computational cost, flexible nature of peptides, and limited structural information of peptide-protein complexes. In recent years, the surge of available biological data has given rise to the development of an increasing number of machine learning models for predicting peptide-protein interactions. These models offer efficient solutions to address the challenges associated with traditional computational approaches. Furthermore, they offer enhanced accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in their predictive outcomes. This review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning and deep learning models that have emerged in recent years for the prediction of peptide-protein interactions.

References

Huang Y, Wuchty S, Zhou Y, Zhang Z . SGPPI: structure-aware prediction of protein-protein interactions in rigorous conditions with graph convolutional network. Brief Bioinform. 2023; 24(2). DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad020. View

Wang L, Wang N, Zhang W, Cheng X, Yan Z, Shao G . Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7(1):48. PMC: 8844085. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4. View

Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y . Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(13):3698-707. PMC: 1540721. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl454. View

Ozturk H, Ozgur A, Ozkirimli E . DeepDTA: deep drug-target binding affinity prediction. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34(17):i821-i829. PMC: 6129291. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593. View

Suzek B, Wang Y, Huang H, McGarvey P, Wu C . UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(6):926-32. PMC: 4375400. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739. View

Kosugi T, Ohue M . Design of Cyclic Peptides Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions Using AlphaFold. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17). PMC: 10487914. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713257. View

Tayeb-Fligelman E, Tabachnikov O, Moshe A, Goldshmidt-Tran O, Sawaya M, Coquelle N . The cytotoxic PSMα3 reveals a cross-α amyloid-like fibril. Science. 2017; 355(6327):831-833. PMC: 6372758. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf4901. View

Zhang M, Su Q, Lu Y, Zhao M, Niu B . Application of Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-protein Interactions Prediction. Med Chem. 2017; 13(6):506-514. DOI: 10.2174/1573406413666170522150940. View

Lin Z, Akin H, Rao R, Hie B, Zhu Z, Lu W . Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science. 2023; 379(6637):1123-1130. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade2574. View

10.

Yang J, Roy A, Zhang Y . BioLiP: a semi-manually curated database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(Database issue):D1096-103. PMC: 3531193. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks966. View

11.

Lee M . Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2023; 28(13). PMC: 10343845. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28135169. View

12.

Meszaros B, Erdos G, Dosztanyi Z . IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1):W329-W337. PMC: 6030935. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky384. View

13.

Wieder O, Kohlbacher S, Kuenemann M, Garon A, Ducrot P, Seidel T . A compact review of molecular property prediction with graph neural networks. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2021; 37:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.11.009. View

14.

Muttenthaler M, King G, Adams D, Alewood P . Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021; 20(4):309-325. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-020-00135-8. View

15.

Robin X, Haas J, Gumienny R, Smolinski A, Tauriello G, Schwede T . Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)-Perspectives on the future of fully automated evaluation of structure prediction methods. Proteins. 2021; 89(12):1977-1986. PMC: 8673552. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26213. View

16.

Lopez-Blanco J, Aliaga J, Quintana-Orti E, Chacon P . iMODS: internal coordinates normal mode analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(Web Server issue):W271-6. PMC: 4086069. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku339. View

17.

McDonald E, Jones T, Plate L, Meiler J, Gulsevin A . Benchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction. Structure. 2022; 31(1):111-119.e2. PMC: 9883802. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.11.012. View

18.

Zalewski M, Kmiecik S, Kolinski M . Molecular Dynamics Scoring of Protein-Peptide Models Derived from Coarse-Grained Docking. Molecules. 2021; 26(11). PMC: 8197827. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26113293. View

19.

Soleymani F, Paquet E, Viktor H, Michalowski W, Spinello D . Protein-protein interaction prediction with deep learning: A comprehensive review. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:5316-5341. PMC: 9520216. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.070. View

20.

Agirrezabala X, Schreiner E, Trabuco L, Lei J, Ortiz-Meoz R, Schulten K . Structural insights into cognate versus near-cognate discrimination during decoding. EMBO J. 2011; 30(8):1497-507. PMC: 3102289. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.58. View