» Articles » PMID: 37960040

Different Physiological Responses to Continuous Drought Between Seedlings and Younger Individuals of

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2023 Nov 14
PMID 37960040
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drought is an important environmental factor that influences physiological processes in plants; however, few studies have examined the physiological mechanisms underlying plants' responses to continuous drought. In this study, the seedlings and younger individuals of were experimentally planted in the southern part of the Gurbantunggut Desert. We measured their photosynthetic traits, functional traits and non-structural carbohydrate contents (NSCs) in order to assess the effects of continuous drought (at 15-day and 30-day drought points) on the plants' physiological responses. The results showed that at the 15-day (15 d) drought point, the leaf light-saturated net photosynthetic rate (A) values of both the seedlings and the younger individuals were decreased (by -68.9% and -45.2%, respectively). The intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) of the seedlings was significantly lower than that of the control group (-52.2%), but there was no diffenrence of iWUE observed in younger individuals. At the 30-day (30 d) drought point, a decrease in the A (-129.8%) of the seedlings was induced via biochemical inhibition, with a lower potential maximum photochemical rate (Fv/Fm, 0.42) compared with the control group, while a decrease in the A (-52.3%) of the younger individuals was induced due to lower stomatal conductance (g, -50.5%). Our results indicated that prolonged drought induced a greater risk of seedling mortality as the relatively limited ability of stomatal regulation may increase the possibility of massive embolism, resulting in hydraulic failure.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Gene Family for Abiotic Stress Regulation in .

Cheng X, Yao S, Zhang J, Wang D, Xu S, Yu Q Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612806 PMC: 11012946. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073996.

References
1.
De Kauwe M, Medlyn B, Ukkola A, Mu M, Sabot M, Pitman A . Identifying areas at risk of drought-induced tree mortality across South-Eastern Australia. Glob Chang Biol. 2020; 26(10):5716-5733. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15215. View

2.
DeSoto L, Cailleret M, Sterck F, Jansen S, Kramer K, Robert E . Low growth resilience to drought is related to future mortality risk in trees. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):545. PMC: 6987235. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14300-5. View

3.
Breshears D, Cobb N, Rich P, Price K, Allen C, Balice R . Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(42):15144-8. PMC: 1250231. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505734102. View

4.
Barber V, Juday G, Finney B . Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature. 2000; 405(6787):668-73. DOI: 10.1038/35015049. View

5.
Peltier D, Carbone M, McIntire C, Robertson N, Thompson R, Malone S . Carbon starvation following a decade of experimental drought consumes old reserves in Pinus edulis. New Phytol. 2023; 240(1):92-104. DOI: 10.1111/nph.19119. View