Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality in the Context of a Knee-spanning External Fixator Placed Inside the MR Bore: a Literature Review

Overview

Journal Skeletal Radiol

Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology

Date 2023 Nov 13

PMID 37955679

Authors

Aaron J Marcel

Joshua S Green

Jack Porrino

Lee D Katz

Michael J Medvecky

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

After emergent assessment of potentially limb-threatening injuries in knee dislocation or multi-ligament knee injury patients, magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to visualize ligamentous structures and plan for soft tissue repair. However, the application of a knee-spanning external fixator may introduce artifact and reduce overall image quality, which can limit the evaluation of soft tissue injury. As a result, the utility of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator has been called into question. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitative scales have been used to assess image quality of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator. Despite the potential for artifact, studies have demonstrated that useful diagnostic information may be obtained from MRI in the presence of an external fixator. This review examines the general principles of anatomical assessment, magnetic field strength, device composition and design, radiofrequency coil use, and MRI sequences and artifact reduction as they pertain to MRI in the presence of a knee-spanning external fixator.

References

Maslaris A, Brinkmann O, Bungartz M, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Liodakis E . Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: What is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(6):1001-1015. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2148-4. View

Cramer C, Frosch K . [External fixator for temporary stabilization of complex periarticular knee fractures]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020; 32(5):410-420. DOI: 10.1007/s00064-020-00674-8. View

Fanelli G . Multiple Ligament Injured Knee: Initial Assessment and Treatment. Clin Sports Med. 2019; 38(2):193-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2018.11.004. View

Goodier W, Calder P . External fixation for the correction of adult post-traumatic deformities. Injury. 2019; 50 Suppl 1:S36-S44. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.040. View

Simpson A, Robiati L, Jalal M, Tsang S . Non-union: Indications for external fixation. Injury. 2019; 50 Suppl 1:S73-S78. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.053. View

Ryan S, Moon A, Gordon M, Flacke S, Soni S, Salzler M . External Fixation Devices Within the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bore: A Safety and Radiologic Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2020; 35(1):e25-e30. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001848. View

Addevico F, Simoncini A, Solitro G, Morandi M . Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee in the Presence of Bridging External Fixation: A Comparative Experimental Evaluation of Four External Fixators, Including Dolphix. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022; 7(1). PMC: 8788467. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk7010004. View

Morandi M, Simoncini A, Hays C, Garrett J, Barton R, Chen A . Optimal configuration for stability and magnetic resonance imaging quality in temporary external fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(7):1405-1412. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.025. View

Elsissy P, Akpolat Y, Chien A, Cheng W . MRI evaluation of the knee with non-ferromagnetic external fixators: cadaveric knee model. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(5):933-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1655-9. View

10.

Ballard D, Garrett J, Simoncini A, Barbeito S, Morandi M . Safety and image quality of MR-conditional external fixators for 1.5 Tesla extremity MR. Emerg Radiol. 2021; 28(3):581-588. PMC: 8122074. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-020-01880-4. View

11.

Javidan P, Owen J, Cutuk A, Watson T, Kaar S . How do spanning external fixators on knee dislocation patients affect the use of MRI and knee stability?. J Knee Surg. 2014; 28(3):247-54. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1386579. View

12.

Lo L, Jubouri S, Mulligan M . MRI of Traumatic Knee Dislocation: A Study to Evaluate Safety and Image Quality for Patients with Knee-Spanning Stabilization Devices. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021; 51(3):317-322. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.04.002. View

13.

Gillig J, Goode R, Campfield B, Crim J, Crist B . Safety and Complications Associated With MRI-Conditional External Fixators in Patients With Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Case Series. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(10):521-525. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001246. View

14.

Hayden B, Theriault R, Bramlett K, Lucas R, McTague M, Bedi H . Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Trauma Patients Treated With Contemporary External Fixation Devices: A Multicenter Case Series. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31(11):e375-e380. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000954. View

15.

Jungmann P, Agten C, Pfirrmann C, Sutter R . Advances in MRI around metal. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 46(4):972-991. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25708. View

16.

Bernstein M, Huston 3rd J, Ward H . Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(4):735-46. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20698. View

17.

Wang Z . Improving SNR of RF coils using composite coil elements. NMR Biomed. 2009; 22(9):952-9. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1410. View

18.

Kratzig T, Mende K, Mohme M, Kniep H, Dreimann M, Stangenberg M . Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging. Neurosurg Rev. 2020; 44(4):2163-2170. PMC: 8338834. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01384-2. View

19.

Ringel F, Ryang Y, Kirschke J, Muller B, Wilkens J, Brodard J . Radiolucent Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Pedicle Screws for Treatment of Spinal Tumors: Advantages for Radiation Planning and Follow-Up Imaging. World Neurosurg. 2017; 105:294-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.091. View

20.

Fleege C, Makowski M, Rauschmann M, Fraunhoffer K, Fennema P, Arabmotlagh M . Carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws reduce artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with lumbar spondylodesis. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16094. PMC: 7527450. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73386-5. View