» Articles » PMID: 37950804

Predictors of Individual and Interpersonal Adjustment Among Non-offending Partners of Individuals With Histories of Sexual Offenses

Overview
Journal Sex Abuse
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Nov 11
PMID 37950804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent research indicates that the consequences of sexual offenses extend beyond target victims, including to non-offending partners of individuals with sexual offense histories. However, little research has focused on non-offending partners' wellbeing and relationships with persons with sexual offense histories leading up to and following acts of sexual aggression. Non-offending partners may be secondary victims of their partners' offenses in managing psychological difficulties (e.g., guilt, shame), social stigma and isolation, fear for their safety, or difficulties in their romantic relationships resulting from their partners' sexual offenses, often with minimal supports. The current study examined key correlates of individual and interpersonal adjustment among 207 non-offending partners of individuals with histories of sexual offenses who were residing in Canada ( = 36) or the United States ( = 171). Findings indicate that positive changes due to the offense (i.e., improved finances), self-esteem, interpersonal adjustment, instrumental support, lower levels of acceptance, and humor positively predicted individual adjustment. Interpersonal adjustment was predicted by trust, intimacy, partner's stress communication, and problem-focused and emotion-focused common dyadic coping. Findings highlight the need for services for non-offending partners, including interventions that address self-esteem and practical difficulties resulting from the offense, and couples therapy to address trust issues, intimacy concerns, and shared coping with stressors related to the offense.

References
1.
Bodenmann G, Meuwly N, Germann J, Nussbeck F, Heinrichs M, Bradbury T . Effects of Stress on the Social Support Provided by Men and Women in Intimate Relationships. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(10):1584-94. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594616. View

2.
Rottmann N, Gilsa Hansen D, Larsen P, Nicolaisen A, Flyger H, Johansen C . Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychol. 2015; 34(5):486-95. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000218. View

3.
Laurenceau J, Barrett L, Rovine M . The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J Fam Psychol. 2005; 19(2):314-23. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314. View

4.
Link B, STRUENING E, Asmussen S, Phelan J . Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(12):1621-6. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1621. View

5.
Burgess Moser M, Johnson S, Dalgleish T, Lafontaine M, Wiebe S, Tasca G . Changes in Relationship-Specific Attachment in Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2015; 42(2):231-45. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12139. View