» Articles » PMID: 37950054

Impact of Active Intra-complex Rest Intervals on Post-back Squat Versus Hip Thrust Jumping Potentiation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Nov 10
PMID 37950054
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the impact of active rest intervals within a lower body complex training session on post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) response in amateur soccer players. Twelve soccer players took part in four different experimental conditions. These sessions included 2 sets of lower body complex-paired exercises, each involving 3 repetitions of either back squats or hip thrusts at 90% one-repetition maximum (1RM) as a conditioning activity paired with a broad jump and countermovement jump. Between those exercises in active intra-complex rest interval conditions, participants were performing 8 repetitions of bench press at 75%1RM or, in passive intra-complex rest interval conditions, rested while seated. A significant main effect of a set to increase broad jump length (p = 0.002), countermovement jump height (p = 0.002), and modified reactive strength index (p = 0.005) was revealed, without any significant differences between conditions. Post-hoc comparisons showed a significant increase in broad jump length from baseline to Set-2 (231 ± 13 vs. 234 ± 13 cm; p = 0.003; ES = 0.22). On the other hand, countermovement jump height and modified reactive strength index significantly increased from baseline to Set-1 (34.4 ± 3.6 vs. 35.6 ± 3.9 cm; p = 0.027; ES = 0.31 and 0.4 ± 0.05 vs. 0.45 ± 0.09; p = 0.005; ES = 0.66). Results of this study showed that to sustain a high training density, sports practitioners may incorporate upper body exercises within the intra-complex rest interval during lower limb complex training sessions and still elicit a significant PAPE effect.

Citing Articles

Effects of 6 weeks of complex training on athletic performance and post-activation performance enhancement effect magnitude in soccer players: a cross-sectional randomized study.

Krzysztofik M, Jarosz J, Urbanski R, Aschenbrenner P, Stastny P Biol Sport. 2025; 42(1):211-221.

PMID: 39758167 PMC: 11694194. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.139849.


Do Activities Performed within the Intra-Contrast Rest Interval Affect Neuromuscular Performance during Complex-Contrast Training Protocols?.

Gutierrez-Flores D, Alcaraz P, Cormier P, Martinez-Serrano A, Freitas T J Hum Kinet. 2024; 91(Spec Issue):33-46.

PMID: 38689590 PMC: 11057618. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/184168.


The Effect of Post-Activation Potentiation Enhancement Alone or in Combination with Caffeine on Anaerobic Performance in Boxers: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Study.

Zhang Y, Diao P, Wang J, Li S, Fan Q, Han Y Nutrients. 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38257128 PMC: 10820078. DOI: 10.3390/nu16020235.

References
1.
Seitz L, de Villarreal E, Haff G . The temporal profile of postactivation potentiation is related to strength level. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 28(3):706-15. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a73ea3. View

2.
Blazevich A, Babault N . Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Perspective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:1359. PMC: 6838751. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01359. View

3.
Pereira L, Boullosa D, Moura T, Mercer V, Fernandes V, Bishop C . Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in Sprinters: Effects of Hard Versus Sand Surfaces. J Hum Kinet. 2022; 82:173-180. PMC: 9465740. DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0062. View

4.
Gee T, Harsley P, Bishop D . Effect of 10 Weeks of Complex Training on Speed and Power in Academy Soccer Players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021; 16(8):1134–1139. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0139. View

5.
Bartolomei S, De Luca R, Marcora S . May a Nonlocalized Postactivation Performance Enhancement Exist Between the Upper and Lower Body in Trained Men?. J Strength Cond Res. 2022; 37(1):68-73. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004243. View