» Articles » PMID: 37948024

Sequential Encoding Aids Working Memory for Meaningful Objects' Identities but Not for Their Colors

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Nov 10
PMID 37948024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have found that real-world objects' identities are better remembered than simple features like colored circles, and this effect is particularly pronounced when these stimuli are encoded one by one in a serial, item-based way. Recent work has also demonstrated that memory for simple features like color is improved if these colors are part of real-world objects, suggesting that meaningful objects can serve as a robust memory scaffold for their associated low-level features. However, it is unclear whether the improved color memory that arises from the colors appearing on real-world objects is affected by encoding format, in particular whether items are encoded sequentially or simultaneously. We test this using randomly colored silhouettes of recognizable versus unrecognizable scrambled objects that offer a uniquely controlled set of stimuli to test color working memory of meaningful versus non-meaningful objects. Participants were presented with four stimuli (silhouettes of objects or scrambled shapes) simultaneously or sequentially. After a short delay, they reported either which colors or which shapes they saw in a two-alternative forced-choice task. We replicated previous findings that meaningful stimuli boost working memory performance for colors (Exp. 1). We found that when participants remembered the colors (Exp. 2) there was no difference in performance across the two encoding formats. However, when participants remembered the shapes and thus identity of the objects (Exp. 3), sequential presentation resulted in better performance than simultaneous presentation. Overall, these results show that different encoding formats can flexibly impact visual working memory depending on what the memory-relevant feature is.

Citing Articles

Multiple item representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention.

Duan C, Zhang L, Song D, Zhang B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8341.

PMID: 40065002 PMC: 11893744. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92612-6.


Modality-, feature-, and strategy-dependent organization of low-level working memory.

Chopurian V, Kienke A, Bledowski C, Christophel T J Vis. 2025; 25(1):16.

PMID: 39873647 PMC: 11781326. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.1.16.


Towards theoretically understanding how long-term memory semantics can support working memory performance.

Hart R, Logie R, Nicholls L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):370-390.

PMID: 39262091 PMC: 11783989. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241284414.


Semantic meaning enhances feature-binding but not quantity or precision of locations in visual working memory.

Sahar T, Gronau N, Makovski T Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):2107-2118.

PMID: 39080186 PMC: 11588879. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01611-x.


What you don't know can't hurt you: Retro-cues benefit working memory regardless of prior knowledge in long-term memory.

Loaiza V, Cheung H, Goldenhaus-Manning D Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):1-12.

PMID: 37932579 PMC: 11192822. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02408-w.

References
1.
Addleman D, Stormer V . No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(4):1338-1346. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7. View

2.
Allen R, Baddeley A, Hitch G . Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006; 135(2):298-313. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.298. View

3.
Alvarez G, Cavanagh P . The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(2):106-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x. View

4.
Asp I, Stormer V, Brady T . Greater Visual Working Memory Capacity for Visually Matched Stimuli When They Are Perceived as Meaningful. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021; 33(5):902-918. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01693. View

5.
Awh E, Barton B, Vogel E . Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(7):622-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01949.x. View