» Articles » PMID: 37944040

Sex Differences in Cancer Incidence Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Nov 9
PMID 37944040
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Males have 2-3-fold greater risk of cancer than females at most shared anatomic sites, possibly reflecting enhanced immune surveillance against cancer in females. We examined whether these sex differences remained among immunocompromised adults.

Methods: Using the Transplant Cancer Match (TCM) study, we estimated the male-to-female incidence rate ratio in TCM (M:F IRRTransplant) for 15 cancer sites diagnosed between 1995 and 2017 using Poisson regression. Male to female IRRs in the general population (M:F IRRGP) were calculated using expected cancer counts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, standardized to the transplant population on age, race and ethnicity, and diagnosis year. Male to female IRRs were compared using a chi-square test.

Results: Among 343 802 solid organ transplants, 211 206 (61.4%) were among men and 132 596 (38.6%) among women. An excess cancer incidence in males was seen in transplant recipients, but the sex difference was attenuated for cancers of the lip (M:F IRRTransplant: 1.81 vs M:F IRRGP: 3.96; P < .0001), stomach (1.51 vs 2.09; P = .002), colorectum (0.98 vs 1.43; P < .0001), liver (2.39 vs 3.44; P = .002), kidney (1.67 vs 2.24; P < .0001), bladder (2.02 vs 4.19; P < .0001), Kaposi sarcoma (1.79 vs 3.26; P = .0009), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.34 vs 1.64; P < .0001). The M:F IRRTransplant was not statistically different from the M:F IRRGP for other cancer sites.

Conclusions: Although male solid organ transplant recipients have higher cancer incidence than female recipients, the attenuation in the male to female ratio for many cancers studied relative to the general population might suggest the importance of immunosurveillance, with some loss of advantage in female recipients due to immunosuppression after transplantation.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trials of Diet Intervention Reports and Their Impact on Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Sauter E, Butera G, Agurs-Collins T Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409915 PMC: 11475623. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193296.


Kaposi's Sarcoma: Evaluation of Clinical Features, Treatment Outcomes, and Prognosis in a Single-Center Retrospective Case Series.

Russo I, Marino D, Cozzolino C, Del Fiore P, Nerjaku F, Finotto S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398082 PMC: 10887034. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040691.

References
1.
Ark J, Alvarez J, Koyama T, Bassett J, Blot W, Mumma M . Variation in the Diagnostic Evaluation among Persons with Hematuria: Influence of Gender, Race and Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2017; 198(5):1033-1038. PMC: 5827951. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.083. View

2.
Li C, Prokopec S, Sun R, Yousif F, Schmitz N, Boutros P . Sex differences in oncogenic mutational processes. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):4330. PMC: 7455744. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17359-2. View

3.
Holme O, Loberg M, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Hernan M, Aas E . Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 168(11):775-782. PMC: 6853067. DOI: 10.7326/M17-1441. View

4.
Cook M, Dawsey S, Freedman N, Inskip P, Wichner S, Quraishi S . Sex disparities in cancer incidence by period and age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(4):1174-82. PMC: 2793271. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1118. View

5.
Doshi B, Athans S, Woloszynska A . Biological differences underlying sex and gender disparities in bladder cancer: current synopsis and future directions. Oncogenesis. 2023; 12(1):44. PMC: 10477245. DOI: 10.1038/s41389-023-00489-9. View