» Articles » PMID: 37943819

Relating Stability of Individual Dynamical Networks to Change in Psychopathology

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Nov 9
PMID 37943819
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One hypothesis flowing from the network theory of psychopathology is that symptom network structure is associated with psychopathology severity and in turn, one may expect that individual network structure changes with the level of psychopathology severity. However, this expectation has rarely been addressed directly. This study aims to examine (1) the stability of individual contemporaneous symptom networks over a one-year period and (2) whether network stability is associated with a change in psychopathology. We used daily diary data of n = 66 individuals, located along the psychosis severity continuum, from two separate 90-day periods, one year apart (t = 180). Based on the newly developed Individual Network Invariance Test (INIT) to assess symptom-network stability, participants were divided into two groups with stable and unstable networks and we tested whether these groups differed in their absolute change in psychopathology severity. The majority of the sample (n = 51, 77.3%) showed a stable network over time while most individuals showed a decrease in psychopathological severity. We found no significant association between a change in psychopathology severity and individual network stability. Our results call for further critical evaluation of the association between networks and psychopathology to optimize the implementation of clinical applications based on current methods.

Citing Articles

Network analysis: An overview for mental health research.

Briganti G, Scutari M, Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Hoekstra R, Golino H Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024; 33(4):e2034.

PMID: 39543824 PMC: 11564129. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.2034.


Understanding the transdiagnostic mechanisms underlying emerging psychopathology in adolescence: study protocol of a 1-year prospective epidemiological (EMERGE) study.

Hafeli X, Hirsig A, Schmidt S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e084821.

PMID: 39542483 PMC: 11575264. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084821.

References
1.
Fang E, Ning Y, Liu H . Testing and Confidence Intervals for High Dimensional Proportional Hazards Model. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2023; 79(5):1415-1437. PMC: 10584375. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12224. View

2.
Borsboom D, Cramer A . Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013; 9:91-121. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608. View

3.
Fisher A, Reeves J, Lawyer G, Medaglia J, Rubel J . Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017; 126(8):1044-1056. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000311. View

4.
Wigman J, van der Tuin S, van den Berg D, Muller M, Booij S . Mental health, risk and protective factors at micro- and macro-levels across early at-risk stages for psychosis: The Mirorr study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022; 17(5):478-494. DOI: 10.1111/eip.13343. View

5.
Robinaugh D, Hoekstra R, Toner E, Borsboom D . The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the literature 2008-2018 and an agenda for future research. Psychol Med. 2019; 50(3):353-366. PMC: 7334828. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719003404. View