» Articles » PMID: 37943373

Clinical Validation of Grouping Conservative Treatments in Neck Pain for Use in a Network Meta-analysis: a Delphi Consensus Study

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Nov 9
PMID 37943373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A network meta-analysis aims to help clinicians make clinical decisions on the most effective treatment for a certain condition. Neck pain is multifactorial, with various classification systems and treatment options. Classifying patients and grouping interventions in clinically relevant treatment nodes for a NMA is essential, but this process is poorly defined.

Objective: Our aim is to obtain consensus among experts on neck pain classifications and the grouping of interventions into nodes for a future network meta-analysis.

Design: A Delphi consensus study involving neck pain experts worldwide.

Methods: We invited authors of neck pain clinical practice guidelines published from 2014 onwards. The Delphi baseline questionnaire was developed based on the findings of a scoping review, including four items on classifications and 19 nodes. Participants were asked to record their level of agreement on a seven-point Likert scale or using Yes/No/Not sure answer options for the various statements. We used descriptive analysis to summarise the responses on each statement with content analysis of the free-text comments.

Results: In total, 18/80 experts (22.5%) agreed to participate in one or more Delphi rounds. We needed three rounds to reach consensus for two classification of neck pain: one based on aetiology and one on duration. In addition, we also reached consensus on the grouping of interventions, including a definition of each node, with the number of nodes reduced to 17.

Conclusion: With this consensus we clinically validated two neck pain classifications and grouped conservative treatments into 17 well-defined and clinically relevant nodes.

Citing Articles

Construction and validation of an instrument to identify barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care.

da Silva L, Silva R, Pereira M, Herdeiro M, Baldoni A Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 16:100529.

PMID: 39512514 PMC: 11541423. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100529.

References
1.
Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi S, Amiri P, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, Sullman M . Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):26. PMC: 8725362. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4. View

2.
Henschke N, Kamper S, Maher C . The epidemiology and economic consequences of pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(1):139-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.010. View

3.
Parikh P, Santaguida P, MacDermid J, Gross A, Eshtiaghi A . Comparison of CPG's for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):81. PMC: 6376764. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2441-3. View

4.
Verhagen A . Physiotherapy management of neck pain. J Physiother. 2020; 67(1):5-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.005. View

5.
IntHout J, Ioannidis J, Borm G . Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012; 25(2):538-52. DOI: 10.1177/0962280212461098. View