Comparison of FNA-based Conventional Cytology Specimens and Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Pancreatic Lesions

Overview

Journal Cytojournal

Date 2023 Nov 9

PMID 37942305

Authors

Farzaneh Khozeymeh

Mona Ariamanesh

Nema Mohamadian Roshan

Amirhossein Jafarian

Mohammadreza Farzanehfar

Hassan Mehrad Majd

Alireza Sedghian

Mansoureh Dehghani

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered in pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the DIA in the evaluation of EUS-FNA based cytopathological specimens of pancreatic masses and comparing it with conventional cytology analysis by pathologist.

Material And Methods: This study was performed using cytological slides related to EUS-FNA samples of pancreatic lesions. The digital images were prepared and then analyzed by ImageJ software. Factors such as perimeter, circularity, area, minimum, maximum, mean, median of gray value, and integrated chromatin density of cell nucleus were extracted by software ImageJ and sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff point were evaluated in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions.

Results: In this retrospective study, 115 cytology samples were examined. Each specimen was reviewed by a pathologist and 150 images were prepared from the benign and malignant lesions and then analyzed by ImageJ software and a cut point was established by SPSS 26. The cutoff points for perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions were reported to be 204.56, 131953, and 24643077, respectively. At this cutting point, the accuracy of estimation is based on the factors of perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of the three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity were 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that digital analysis of images has a high accuracy in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions in the cytology of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy and by obtaining cutoff points by software output factors; digital imaging can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors.

Citing Articles

A few-shot diabetes foot ulcer image classification method based on deep ResNet and transfer learning.

Wang C, Yu Z, Long Z, Zhao H, Wang Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29877.

PMID: 39622873 PMC: 11612188. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80691-w.

Enhancing image-based diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract diseases through deep learning with EfficientNet and advanced data augmentation techniques.

Zubair Rahman A, Mythili R, Chokkanathan K, Mahesh T, Vanitha K, Yimer T BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):306.

PMID: 39533216 PMC: 11555998. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01479-y.

References

Momeni-Boroujeni A, Yousefi E, Somma J . Computer-assisted cytologic diagnosis in pancreatic FNA: An application of neural networks to image analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017; 125(12):926-933. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21915. View

Pantanowitz L, Hornish M, Goulart R . The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology. Cytojournal. 2009; 6:6. PMC: 2678829. DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.48606. View

Pantanowitz L . Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform. 2010; 1. PMC: 2941968. DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.68332. View

Costache M, Iordache S, Karstensen J, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: from the past to the future. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014; 2(2):77-85. PMC: 4062239. DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.117691. View

Minot D, Voss J, Rademacher S, Lwin T, Orsulak J, Caron B . Image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemical staining. Reproducibility and concordance with fluorescence in situ hybridization of a laboratory-validated scoring technique. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 137(2):270-6. DOI: 10.1309/AJCP9MKNLHQNK2ZX. View

Levy M, Oberg T, Campion M, Clayton A, Halling K, Henry M . Comparison of methods to detect neoplasia in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastroenterology. 2012; 142(5):1112-1121.e2. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.002. View

Levy M, Clain J, Clayton A, Halling K, Kipp B, Rajan E . Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66(3):483-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1053. View

Gupta S, Dey P . Diagnostic challenges in the gray-zone lesions of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Cytojournal. 2021; 18:23. PMC: 8571265. DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_66_2020. View

Stalhammar G, Fuentes Martinez N, Lippert M, Tobin N, Molholm I, Kis L . Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016; 29(4):318-29. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.34. View

10.

Banafea O, Mghanga F, Zhao J, Zhao R, Zhu L . Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration for histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016; 16:108. PMC: 5007683. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0519-z. View

11.

Grosse C, Noack P, Silye R . Accuracy of grading pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with Ki-67 index in fine-needle aspiration cellblock material. Cytopathology. 2018; 30(2):187-193. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12643. View

12.

Antonini P, Santonicco N, Pantanowitz L, Girolami I, Rizzo P, Brunelli M . Relevance of the College of American Pathologists guideline for validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes to cytopathology. Cytopathology. 2022; 34(1):5-14. PMC: 10087327. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13178. View

13.

Mounzer R, Yen R, Marshall C, Sams S, Mehrotra S, Said M . Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4(7):E812-9. PMC: 4993880. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108188. View

14.

Suzuki M, Moriya S, Kobayashi S, Nishijima Y, Fujii T, Ikota H . Computer-assisted image analysis of cytological specimens clarify the correlation between nuclear size and intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions regardless of BRAFV600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cytopathology. 2021; 32(6):718-731. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13022. View

15.

Bankhead P . Developing image analysis methods for digital pathology. J Pathol. 2022; 257(4):391-402. PMC: 9324951. DOI: 10.1002/path.5921. View

16.

Kong F, Kong X, Zhu J, Sun T, Du Y, Wang K . A prospective comparison of conventional cytology and digital image analysis for the identification of pancreatic malignancy in patients undergoing EUS-FNA. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019; 8(4):269-276. PMC: 6714483. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_9_19. View

17.

Itonaga M, Ashida R, Kitano M . The usefulness of liquid-based cytology for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:943792. PMC: 9424663. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.943792. View

18.

Hartman D, Ahmad F, Ferris R, Rimm D, Pantanowitz L . Utility of CD8 score by automated quantitative image analysis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2018; 86:278-287. PMC: 6260977. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.005. View

19.

Marshall C, Mounzer R, Hall M, Simon V, Centeno B, Dennis K . Suboptimal Agreement Among Cytopathologists in Diagnosis of Malignancy Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound Needle Aspirates of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Validation Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 16(7):1114-1122.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.013. View

20.

Girolami I, Marletta S, Pantanowitz L, Torresani E, Ghimenton C, Barbareschi M . Impact of image analysis and artificial intelligence in thyroid pathology, with particular reference to cytological aspects. Cytopathology. 2020; 31(5):432-444. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12828. View