» Articles » PMID: 37941662

Drought Response of Water-conserving and Non-conserving Spring Barley Cultivars

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2023 Nov 9
PMID 37941662
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Breeding barley cultivars adapted to drought requires in-depth knowledge on physiological drought responses.

Methods: We used a high-throughput functional phenotyping platform to examine the response of four high-yielding European spring barley cultivars to a standardized drought treatment imposed around flowering.

Results: Cv. Chanell showed a non-conserving water-use behavior with high transpiration and maximum productivity under well-watered conditions but rapid transpiration decrease under drought. The poor recovery upon re-irrigation translated to large yield losses. Cv. Baronesse showed the most water-conserving behavior, with the lowest pre-drought transpiration and the most gradual transpiration reduction under drought. Its good recovery (resilience) prevented large yield losses. Cv. Formula was less conserving than cv. Baronesse and produced low yet stable yields. Cv. RGT's dynamic water use with high transpiration under ample water supply and moderate transpiration decrease under drought combined with high resilience secured the highest and most stable yields.

Discussion: Such a dynamic water-use behavior combined with higher drought resilience and favorable root traits could potentially create an ideotype for intermediate drought. Prospective studies will examine these results in field experiments and will use the newly gained understanding on water use in barley to improve process descriptions in crop simulation models to support crop model-aided ideotype design.

Citing Articles

A missense mutation in the barley Xan-h gene encoding the Mg-chelatase subunit I leads to a viable pale green line with reduced daily transpiration rate.

Persello A, Tadini L, Rotasperti L, Ballabio F, Tagliani A, Torricella V Plant Cell Rep. 2024; 43(10):246.

PMID: 39343835 PMC: 11439855. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-024-03328-2.


Dynamic physiological response of tef to contrasting water availabilities.

Alemu M, Barak V, Shenhar I, Batat D, Saranga Y Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1406173.

PMID: 39045591 PMC: 11264344. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1406173.


Precision phenotyping of a barley diversity set reveals distinct drought response strategies.

Paul M, Dalal A, Jaaskelainen M, Moshelion M, Schulman A Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1393991.

PMID: 38984164 PMC: 11231632. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1393991.

References
1.
Senapati N, Semenov M, Halford N, Hawkesford M, Asseng S, Cooper M . Global wheat production could benefit from closing the genetic yield gap. Nat Food. 2023; 3(7):532-541. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00540-9. View

2.
Grillakis M . Increase in severe and extreme soil moisture droughts for Europe under climate change. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 660:1245-1255. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.001. View

3.
Domec J, Johnson D . Does homeostasis or disturbance of homeostasis in minimum leaf water potential explain the isohydric versus anisohydric behavior of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars?. Tree Physiol. 2012; 32(3):245-8. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps013. View

4.
Galle A, Csiszar J, Benyo D, Laskay G, Leviczky T, Erdei L . Isohydric and anisohydric strategies of wheat genotypes under osmotic stress: biosynthesis and function of ABA in stress responses. J Plant Physiol. 2013; 170(16):1389-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.04.010. View

5.
Bertolino L, Caine R, Gray J . Impact of Stomatal Density and Morphology on Water-Use Efficiency in a Changing World. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:225. PMC: 6414756. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00225. View