» Articles » PMID: 37936146

Development and Validation of the Perceived Benefits of Team-Interaction Training Questionnaire (PBTITQ) Among Undergraduates

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Nov 8
PMID 37936146
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of team-interaction training has been proven. However, there is a lack of objective and accurate evaluation tools for the impact and benefits of team-interaction training on participants. This study aims to develop and validate a tool for exploring undergraduates' perception of benefits in team-interaction. It can further insight into the perceived benefits of team-interaction training for undergraduates and evaluates the effectiveness of the course, and provides a reference point for the development of university team-interaction training courses.

Methods: This study was conducted in three stages. Phase 1 consisted of item generation: A theoretical framework was crafted based on social cognitive theory, self-efficacy theory, and sports performance models. Fifty-two items were generated based on the theoretical framework, participant interviews, and literature review. After Delphi consultation and pilot tests, 39 items moved on to Phase 2. Phase 2 consisted of forming a preliminary questionnaire: the contents to be included were selected through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). A total of 40 classes were selected for EFA. After EFA, a three-factor structure with 25 items was formed. The third stage tested psychometric properties through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency.

Results: The final PBTITQ consisted of 23 items, each rated from "1" (fully disagree) to "5" (fully agree). EFA and CFA supported the three-factor structure of PBTITQ, which included Cohesion, Communication, and Efficiency. The Cronbach's alpha of the PBTITQ was 0.90, the test-retest reliability was 0.88, and the split-half reliability was 0.81. PBTITQ significantly correlated with the GEQ (r = 0.808, p < 0.05) and the TDM (r = 0.796, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The PBTITQ is an effective tool for assessing the perceived benefits of team-interaction training among undergraduates.

References
1.
Sakaluk J, Short S . A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources. J Sex Res. 2016; 54(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538. View

2.
Vogel D, Meyer M, Harendza S . Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):157. PMC: 6029273. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9. View

3.
Baugh A, Vanderbilt A, Baugh R . Communication training is inadequate: the role of deception, non-verbal communication, and cultural proficiency. Med Educ Online. 2020; 25(1):1820228. PMC: 7534221. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1820228. View

4.
Carron A, Widmeyer W, Brawley L . The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. Can J Sport Sci. 1989; 14(1):55-9. View

5.
Kakemam E, Rouzbahani M, Rajabi M, Roh Y . Psychometric testing of the Iranian version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perception questionnaire: a cross-cultural validation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):705. PMC: 8285772. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06739-z. View