Effects of High-intensity Gait Training with and Without Soft Robotic Exosuits in People Post-stroke: a Development-of-concept Pilot Crossover Trial

Overview

Journal J Neuroeng Rehabil

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Neurology
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2023 Nov 8

PMID 37936135

Authors

Franchino Porciuncula

Dheepak Arumukhom Revi

Teresa C Baker

Regina Sloutsky

Conor J Walsh

Terry D Ellis

Louis N Awad

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: High-intensity gait training is widely recognized as an effective rehabilitation approach after stroke. Soft robotic exosuits that enhance post-stroke gait mechanics have the potential to improve the rehabilitative outcomes achieved by high-intensity gait training. The objective of this development-of-concept pilot crossover study was to evaluate the outcomes achieved by high-intensity gait training with versus without soft robotic exosuits.

Methods: In this 2-arm pilot crossover study, four individuals post-stroke completed twelve visits of speed-based, high-intensity gait training: six consecutive visits of Robotic Exosuit Augmented Locomotion (REAL) gait training and six consecutive visits without the exosuit (CONTROL). The intervention arms were counterbalanced across study participants and separated by 6 + weeks of washout. Walking function was evaluated before and after each intervention using 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance and 10-m walk test (10mWT) speed. Moreover, 10mWT speeds were evaluated before each training visit, with the time-course of change in walking speed computed for each intervention arm. For each participant, changes in each outcome were compared to minimal clinically-important difference (MCID) thresholds. Secondary analyses focused on changes in propulsion mechanics and associated biomechanical metrics.

Results: Large between-group effects were observed for 6MWT distance (d = 1.41) and 10mWT speed (d = 1.14). REAL gait training resulted in an average pre-post change of 68 ± 27 m (p = 0.015) in 6MWT distance, compared to a pre-post change of 30 ± 16 m (p = 0.035) after CONTROL gait training. Similarly, REAL training resulted in a pre-post change of 0.08 ± 0.03 m/s (p = 0.012) in 10mWT speed, compared to a pre-post change of 0.01 ± 06 m/s (p = 0.76) after CONTROL. For both outcomes, 3 of 4 (75%) study participants surpassed MCIDs after REAL training, whereas 1 of 4 (25%) surpassed MCIDs after CONTROL training. Across the training visits, REAL training resulted in a 1.67 faster rate of improvement in walking speed. Similar patterns of improvement were observed for the secondary gait biomechanical outcomes, with REAL training resulting in significantly improved paretic propulsion for 3 of 4 study participants (p < 0.05) compared to 1 of 4 after CONTROL.

Conclusion: Soft robotic exosuits have the potential to enhance the rehabilitative outcomes produced by high-intensity gait training after stroke. Findings of this development-of-concept pilot crossover trial motivate continued development and study of the REAL gait training program.

References

Arens P, Siviy C, Bae J, Choe D, Karavas N, Baker T . Real-time gait metric estimation for everyday gait training with wearable devices in people poststroke. Wearable Technol. 2021; 2. PMC: 8360352. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2020.11. View

Ding Y, Kim M, Kuindersma S, Walsh C . Human-in-the-loop optimization of hip assistance with a soft exosuit during walking. Sci Robot. 2020; 3(15). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar5438. View

Fulk G, He Y, Boyne P, Dunning K . Predicting Home and Community Walking Activity Poststroke. Stroke. 2017; 48(2):406-411. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015309. View

Hornby T, Reisman D, Ward I, Scheets P, Miller A, Haddad D . Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Locomotor Function Following Chronic Stroke, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, and Brain Injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019; 44(1):49-100. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000303. View

Hornby T, Henderson C, Plawecki A, Lucas E, Lotter J, Holthus M . Contributions of Stepping Intensity and Variability to Mobility in Individuals Poststroke. Stroke. 2019; 50(9):2492-2499. PMC: 7241260. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026254. View

Barthuly A, Bohannon R, Gorack W . Gait speed is a responsive measure of physical performance for patients undergoing short-term rehabilitation. Gait Posture. 2012; 36(1):61-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.002. View

Dobkin B . Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(3):197-206. PMC: 4099048. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309331863. View

Awad L, Binder-Macleod S, Pohlig R, Reisman D . Paretic Propulsion and Trailing Limb Angle Are Key Determinants of Long-Distance Walking Function After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 29(6):499-508. PMC: 4426250. DOI: 10.1177/1545968314554625. View

Porciuncula F, Baker T, Arumukhom Revi D, Bae J, Sloutsky R, Ellis T . Targeting Paretic Propulsion and Walking Speed With a Soft Robotic Exosuit: A Trial. Front Neurorobot. 2021; 15:689577. PMC: 8356079. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.689577. View

10.

Bowden M, Balasubramanian C, Neptune R, Kautz S . Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke. 2006; 37(3):872-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d. View

11.

Lang C, Macdonald J, Reisman D, Boyd L, Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens S . Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(10):1692-8. PMC: 3008558. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005. View

12.

Madhavan S, Lim H, Sivaramakrishnan A, Iyer P . Effects of high intensity speed-based treadmill training on ambulatory function in people with chronic stroke: A preliminary study with long-term follow-up. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1985. PMC: 6374472. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37982-w. View

13.

Liang J, Ho K, Lee Y, Ackley C, Aki K, Arias J . Slow Walking in Individuals with Chronic Post-Stroke Hemiparesis: Speed Mediated Effects of Gait Kinetics and Ankle Kinematics. Brain Sci. 2021; 11(3). PMC: 8000078. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11030365. View

14.

Chen G, Patten C, Kothari D, Zajac F . Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005; 22(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.009. View

15.

Grau-Pellicer M, Chamarro-Lusar A, Medina-Casanovas J, Serda Ferrer B . Walking speed as a predictor of community mobility and quality of life after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019; 26(5):349-358. DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1605751. View

16.

Patterson S, Forrester L, Rodgers M, Ryan A, Ivey F, Sorkin J . Determinants of walking function after stroke: differences by deficit severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(1):115-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.025. View

17.

Kesar T, Binder-Macleod S, Hicks G, Reisman D . Minimal detectable change for gait variables collected during treadmill walking in individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2010; 33(2):314-7. PMC: 3042506. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.024. View

18.

Hsiao H, Knarr B, Higginson J, Binder-Macleod S . The relative contribution of ankle moment and trailing limb angle to propulsive force during gait. Hum Mov Sci. 2014; 39:212-21. PMC: 4272868. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.008. View

19.

Tilson J, Sullivan K, Cen S, Rose D, Koradia C, Azen S . Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther. 2009; 90(2):196-208. PMC: 2816032. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090079. View

20.

Awad L, Bae J, Kudzia P, Long A, Hendron K, Holt K . Reducing Circumduction and Hip Hiking During Hemiparetic Walking Through Targeted Assistance of the Paretic Limb Using a Soft Robotic Exosuit. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96(10 Suppl 1):S157-S164. PMC: 7479995. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000800. View