» Articles » PMID: 37930579

Non-excisional Techniques for the Treatment of Intergluteal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 6
PMID 37930579
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-excisional techniques for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) have gained popularity over the last years. The aim of this study was to review short and long-term outcomes for non-excisional techniques with special focus on the additive effect of treatment of the inner lining of the sinus cavity and the difference between primary and recurrent PSD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases for studies on non-excisional techniques for PSD including pit picking techniques with or without additional laser or phenol treatment, unroofing, endoscopic techniques and thrombin gelatin matrix application. Outcomes were recurrence rates, healing rates, complication rates, wound healing times and time taken to return to daily activities. In total, 31 studies comprising 8100 patients were included. Non-excisional techniques had overall healing rates ranging from 67 to 100%. Recurrence rates for pit picking, unroofing and gelatin matrix application varied from 0 to 16% depending on the follow-up time. Recurrence rates after additional laser, phenol and endoscopic techniques varied from 0 to 29%. Complication rates ranged from 0 to 16%, and the wound healing time was between three and forty-seven days. The return to daily activities varied from one to nine days. Non-excisional techniques are associated with fast recovery and low morbidity but recurrence rates are high. Techniques that attempt to additionally treat the inner lining of the sinus have worse recurrence rates than pit picking alone. Recurrence rates do not differ between primary and recurrent disease.

Citing Articles

Evaluating efficacy and outcomes: comparison of laser treatment and crystallized phenol in pilonidal sinus disease.

Emral A, Gulen M, Ege B Front Surg. 2025; 11():1494382.

PMID: 39834506 PMC: 11743505. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494382.


Pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: lessons learned after 100 consecutive cases.

Perez-Bertolez S, Casal-Beloy I, Pasten A, Martin-Sole O, Salcedo P, Tapia L Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 29(1):14.

PMID: 39656288 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03049-4.


Phenolization of the sinus tract in recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: long-term results of a prospective cohort study.

de Kort J, Pronk A, Vriens M, Smakman N, Furnee E Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024; 39(1):168.

PMID: 39422799 PMC: 11489158. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04742-4.


Unusual position of pilonidal sinus in children may explain its malformative etiology: Case report and review of the literature.

Noviello C, Romano M, Marzuillo P, Andrea R, Papparella A Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 116:109444.

PMID: 38430899 PMC: 10944116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109444.

References
1.
Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Simsek A, Unlu A, Tekin O, Cetiner S . Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol application and factors affecting the recurrence. Tech Coloproctol. 2005; 9(1):21-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-005-0187-4. View

2.
Kargin S, Dogru O, Turan E, Kerimoglu R, Nazik E, Esen E . Previously operated recurrent pilonidal sinus treated with crystallized phenol: Twenty-year experience in a cohort study. Turk J Surg. 2022; 38(2):187-195. PMC: 9714652. DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5247. View

3.
Emiroglu M, Karaali C, Esin H, Akpinar G, Aydin C . Treatment of pilonidal disease by phenol application. Turk J Surg. 2017; 33(1):5-9. PMC: 5448572. DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3532. View

4.
Bruce R, Santodonato J, NEAL M . Summary review of the health effects associated with phenol. Toxicol Ind Health. 1987; 3(4):535-68. DOI: 10.1177/074823378700300407. View

5.
Sakcak I, Avsar F, Cosgun E . Comparison of the application of low concentration and 80% phenol solution in pilonidal sinus disease. JRSM Short Rep. 2010; 1(1):5. PMC: 2984340. DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2009.100047. View