» Articles » PMID: 37929219

The Effects of Various Scaling Instruments on the Surface Roughness of Monolithic Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate

Overview
Journal Eur Oral Res
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Nov 6
PMID 37929219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study aims to evaluate the effects of plastic piezoelectric maintenance tips on the surface roughness of monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia.

Materials And Methods: Fifty-four lithium disilicate and 54 zirconia disks were prepared with CAD/CAM. On each material, scaling with a stainless-steel curette or with a piezoelectric device using either a steel or plastic tip was conducted. The surface roughness of the materials before and after the instrumentation was measured with a profilometer. The changes in roughness of the materials according to the scaling methods were analyzed with generalized linear models. Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction was used for between-group comparisons.

Results: The instruments caused surface alterations on both materials (p=0.001), while the roughness change of lithium disilicate and zirconia specimens did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference with each other (p=0.274). However, the curette was found to cause significantly more (p=0.019) roughness change (0.259 ±0.405) on the specimens than the piezoelectric plastic tip (0.060 ±0.238).

Conclusion: Piezoelectric scalers with plastic tips cause less deterioration on monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate surfaces when compared to stainless-steel hand curettes.

References
1.
Kocher T, Rosin M, Langenbeck N, Bernhardt O . Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth (II). Subgingival roughness. J Clin Periodontol. 2001; 28(8):723-9. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280802.x. View

2.
Baek S, Shon W, Bae K, Kum K, Lee W, Park Y . Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(11):1269-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02302.x. View

3.
Leknes K . The influence of anatomic and iatrogenic root surface characteristics on bacterial colonization and periodontal destruction: a review. J Periodontol. 1997; 68(6):507-16. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.507. View

4.
Ioannou I, Dimitriadis N, Papadimitriou K, Sakellari D, Vouros I, Konstantinidis A . Hand instrumentation versus ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical and microbiological trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(2):132-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01347.x. View

5.
Stawarczyk B, Mandl A, Liebermann A . Modern CAD/CAM silicate ceramics, their translucency level and impact of hydrothermal aging on translucency, Martens hardness, biaxial flexural strength and their reliability. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021; 118:104456. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104456. View