Association Between Clinician-Level Factors and Patient Outcomes in Virtual and In-Person Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Multilevel Analysis

Overview

Journal JMIR Hum Factors

Specialty Health Services

Date 2023 Nov 3

PMID 37921853

Authors

Justine W Welsh

Siara I Sitar

Michael J Parks

Samantha C Patton

Jacqueline E Braughton

Lance A Waller

Quyen M Ngo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The use of virtual treatment services increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, large-scale research on virtual treatment for substance use disorder (SUD), including factors that may influence outcomes, has not advanced with the rapidly changing landscape.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the link between clinician-level factors and patient outcomes in populations receiving virtual and in-person intensive outpatient services.

Methods: Data came from patients (n=1410) treated in a virtual intensive outpatient program (VIOP) and an in-person intensive outpatient program (IOP), who were discharged between January 2020 and March 2021 from a national treatment organization. Patient data were nested by treatment providers (n=58) examining associations with no-shows and discharge with staff approval. Empathy, comfort with technology, perceived stress, resistance to change, and demographic covariates were examined at the clinician level.

Results: The VIOP (β=-5.71; P=.03) and the personal distress subscale measure (β=-6.31; P=.003) were negatively associated with the percentage of no-shows. The VIOP was positively associated with discharges with staff approval (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.50-3.76). Clinician scores on perspective taking (β=-9.22; P=.02), personal distress (β=-9.44; P=.02), and male clinician gender (β=-6.43; P=.04) were negatively associated with in-person no-shows. Patient load was positively associated with discharge with staff approval (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06).

Conclusions: Overall, patients in the VIOP had fewer no-shows and a higher rate of successful discharge. Few clinician-level characteristics were significantly associated with patient outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand the relationships among factors such as clinician gender, patient load, personal distress, and patient retention.

Citing Articles

Patient Engagement in Providing Telehealth SUD IOP Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Contreras-Schwartz J, ONeill C, Threlkeld A, OCallaghan E, Winsberg M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765981 PMC: 11675410. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242554.

References

Andreadis K, Muellers K, Ancker J, Horowitz C, Kaushal R, Lin J . Telemedicine Impact on the Patient-Provider Relationship in Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Care. 2023; 61(Suppl 1):S83-S88. PMC: 9994565. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001808. View

Steinfeldt J, Clay S, Priester P . Prevalence and perceived importance of racial matching in the psychotherapeutic dyad: a national survey of addictions treatment clinical practices. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020; 15(1):76. PMC: 7545852. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-020-00318-x. View

Ngo Q, Braughton J, Gliske K, Waller L, Sitar S, Kretman D . In-Person Versus Telehealth Setting for the Delivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Ecologically Valid Comparison Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(4):e34408. PMC: 9016509. DOI: 10.2196/34408. View

Cowan K, McKean A, Gentry M, Hilty D . Barriers to Use of Telepsychiatry: Clinicians as Gatekeepers. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019; 94(12):2510-2523. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018. View

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R . A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4):385-96. View

Tauscher J, Cohn E, Johnson T, Diteman K, Ries R, Atkins D . What do clinicians want? Understanding frontline addiction treatment clinicians' preferences and priorities to improve the design of measurement-based care technology. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021; 16(1):38. PMC: 8205211. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-021-00247-5. View

Owen J, Wampold B, Kopta M, Rousmaniere T, Miller S . As good as it gets? Therapy outcomes of trainees over time. J Couns Psychol. 2016; 63(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000112. View

Delgadillo J, Branson A, Kellett S, Myles-Hooton P, Hardy G, Shafran R . Therapist personality traits as predictors of psychological treatment outcomes. Psychother Res. 2020; 30(7):857-870. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1731927. View

Johnsen T, Friborg O . The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy as an anti-depressive treatment is falling: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2015; 141(4):747-68. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000015. View

10.

Anderson T, McClintock A, Himawan L, Song X, Patterson C . A prospective study of therapist facilitative interpersonal skills as a predictor of treatment outcome. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015; 84(1):57-66. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000060. View

11.

Riedel L, Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A, Busch A, Barnett M, Raja P . Use of telemedicine for opioid use disorder treatment - Perceptions and experiences of opioid use disorder clinicians. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021; 228:108999. PMC: 8595779. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108999. View

12.

Mercer S, Reynolds W . Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 Suppl:S9-12. PMC: 1316134. View

13.

Stein D, Lambert M . Graduate training in psychotherapy: are therapy outcomes enhanced?. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63(2):182-96. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.2.182. View

14.

Day N, Wass M, Smith K . Virtual opioid agonist treatment: Alberta's virtual opioid dependency program and outcomes. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022; 17(1):40. PMC: 9330968. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00323-4. View

15.

Petry N, Bickel W . Therapeutic alliance and psychiatric severity as predictors of completion of treatment for opioid dependence. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(2):219-27. DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.2.219. View

16.

Ackerman S, Hilsenroth M . A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003; 23(1):1-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00146-0. View

17.

Cabral R, Smith T . Racial/ethnic matching of clients and therapists in mental health services: a meta-analytic review of preferences, perceptions, and outcomes. J Couns Psychol. 2011; 58(4):537-54. DOI: 10.1037/a0025266. View

18.

Anderberg P, Eivazzadeh S, Berglund J . A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older People's Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(5):e13951. PMC: 6552448. DOI: 10.2196/13951. View

19.

Waite M, Diab S, Adefisoye J . Virtual Behavioral Health Treatment Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Time. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022; 9(3):158-165. PMC: 9302910. DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1918. View

20.

Gilligan C, Powell M, Lynagh M, Ward B, Lonsdale C, Harvey P . Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 2:CD012418. PMC: 8094582. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2. View