» Articles » PMID: 37917788

Soil Microbiome Analysis Reveals Effects of Periodic Waterlogging Stress on Sugarcane Growth

Abstract

Sugarcane is one of the major agricultural crops with high economic importance in Thailand. Periodic waterlogging has a long-term negative effect on sugarcane development, soil properties, and microbial diversity, impacting overall sugarcane production. Yet, the microbial structure in periodically waterlogged sugarcane fields across soil compartments and growth stages in Thailand has not been documented. This study investigated soil and rhizosphere microbial communities in a periodic waterlogged field in comparison with a normal field in a sugarcane plantation in Ratchaburi, Thailand, using 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing. Alpha diversity analysis revealed comparable values in periodic waterlogged and normal fields across all growth stages, while beta diversity analysis highlighted distinct microbial community profiles in both fields throughout the growth stages. In the periodic waterlogged field, the relative abundance of Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, and Basidiomycota increased, while Acidobacteria and Ascomycota decreased. Beneficial microbes such as Arthrobacter, Azoarcus, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces thrived in the normal field, potentially serving as biomarkers for favorable soil conditions. Conversely, phytopathogens and growth-inhibiting bacteria were prevalent in the periodic waterlogged field, indicating unfavorable conditions. The co-occurrence network in rhizosphere of the normal field had the highest complexity, implying increased sharing of resources among microorganisms and enhanced soil biological fertility. Altogether, this study demonstrated that the periodic waterlogged field had a long-term negative effect on the soil microbial community which is a key determining factor of sugarcane growth.

Citing Articles

Composition, Seasonal Dynamics and Metabolic Potential of the Rhizosphere Microbiome Associated with Wild White Poplar.

Popchenko M, Karpov D, Gladysh N, Kovalev M, Volodin V, Krasnov G BioTech (Basel). 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39727489 PMC: 11674042. DOI: 10.3390/biotech13040052.


Uncovering the effect of waterlogging stress on plant microbiome and disease development: current knowledge and future perspectives.

Tyagi A, Ali S, Mir R, Sharma S, Arpita K, Almalki M Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1407789.

PMID: 38903424 PMC: 11187287. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1407789.

References
1.
Hossain M, Sultana F, Kubota M, Koyama H, Hyakumachi M . The plant growth-promoting fungus Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 induces resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by activation of multiple defense signals. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007; 48(12):1724-36. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcm144. View

2.
Assenov Y, Ramirez F, Schelhorn S, Lengauer T, Albrecht M . Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2007; 24(2):282-4. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm554. View

3.
Qin J, Gao J, Zhang Y, Yang S, Bai M, Ma Y . Polyhydroxylated steroids from an endophytic fungus, Chaetomium globosum ZY-22 isolated from Ginkgo biloba. Steroids. 2009; 74(9):786-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.04.011. View

4.
Finzi A, Abramoff R, Spiller K, Brzostek E, Darby B, Kramer M . Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob Chang Biol. 2014; 21(5):2082-94. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12816. View

5.
Martinez-Arias C, Witzell J, Solla A, Martin J, Rodriguez-Calcerrada J . Beneficial and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions during flooding stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2022; 45(10):2875-2897. PMC: 9543564. DOI: 10.1111/pce.14403. View