» Articles » PMID: 37910445

Mediolateral Foot Placement Control Can Be Trained: Older Adults Learn to Walk More Stable, when Ankle Moments Are Constrained

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Nov 1
PMID 37910445
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Falls are a problem, especially for older adults. Placing our feet accurately relative to the center-of-mass helps us to prevent falling during gait. The degree of foot placement control with respect to the center-of mass kinematic state is decreased in older as compared to young adults. Here, we attempted to train mediolateral foot placement control in healthy older adults. Ten older adults trained by walking on shoes with a narrow ridge underneath (LesSchuh), restricting mediolateral center-of-pressure shifts. As a training effect, we expected improved foot placement control during normal walking. A training session consisted of a normal walking condition, followed by a training condition on LesSchuh and finally an after-effect condition. Participants performed six of such training sessions, spread across three weeks. As a control, before the first training session, we included two similar sessions, but on normal shoes only. We evaluated whether a training effect was observed across sessions and weeks in a repeated-measures design. Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohen's d = 0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohen's d = 0.686) and 3 (cohen's d = 0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohen's d = 0.875). Local dynamic stability of normal walking also improved significantly. More precise foot placement may thus have led to improved stability. It remains to be determined whether the training effects were the result of walking on LesSchuh or from repeated treadmill walking itself. Moreover, enhancement of mechanisms beyond the scope of our outcome measures may have improved stability. At the retention test, gait stability returned to similar levels as in the control week. Yet, a reduction in foot placement error persisted.

References
1.
Guralnik J, Ferrucci L, Pieper C, Leveille S, Markides K, Ostir G . Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000; 55(4):M221-31. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/55.4.m221. View

2.
Tinetti M, Speechley M, Ginter S . Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319(26):1701-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604. View

3.
Hof A, Duysens J . Responses of human hip abductor muscles to lateral balance perturbations during walking. Exp Brain Res. 2013; 230(3):301-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3655-5. View

4.
Rankin B, Buffo S, Dean J . A neuromechanical strategy for mediolateral foot placement in walking humans. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 112(2):374-83. PMC: 4064420. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00138.2014. View

5.
Fisher S, Ottenbacher K, Goodwin J, Graham J, Ostir G . Short Physical Performance Battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010; 21(6):445-52. PMC: 2822997. DOI: 10.1007/BF03327444. View