» Articles » PMID: 37904553

Co-mutation of TP53 and TTN is Correlated with the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2023 Oct 31
PMID 37904553
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy has been a promising treatment in advanced lung cancer. However, only a few patients could benefit from it. Herein, we aimed to explore mutationrelated predictive biomarkers in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), which could help develop clinical immunotherapy strategies and screen beneficial populations.

Methods: Co-occurrence and mutually exclusive analysis was conducted on the TCGA-LUSC cohort. Correlations between the gene mutation status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) levels, and neo-antigen levels were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. Kaplan-Meier method was employed to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS) of lung cancer patients with immunotherapy. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to investigate the functional changes affected by TP53/TTN. The immune cell infiltration landscape in co-mutation subgroups was analyzed using CIBERSORT.

Results: 1) TP53, TTN, CSMD3, MUC16, RYR2, LRP1B, USH2A, SYNE1, ZFHX4, FAM135B, KMT2D, and NAV3 were frequently mutated in LUSC patients. 2) TMB levels in highly mutated groups were higher than that in wild type groups. 3) There were higher neoantigen levels in mutation group compared to the wild-type group, and LUSC patients in mutation group had longer PFS. 4) TP53/TTN co-mutation group exhibited higher TMB levels and better response to immunotherapy. 5) A host of immune-related signaling pathways was inhibited in TP53/TTN subgroup. 6) There were more T follicular helper cells and NK cells were in TP53/TTN subgroup than in the WT subgroup.

Conclusion: The LUSC patients with TP53 and TTN co-mutation had higher TMB levels and better response to immunotherapy. The TP53 and TTN co-mutation is a promising novel biomarker to assist LUSC immunotherapy evaluation.

Citing Articles

Treatment Options for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Liver Metastases.

Ceriman Krstic V, Samardzic N, Gajic M, Savic M, Seha B, Roksandic Milenkovic M Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(12):13443-13455.

PMID: 39727930 PMC: 11726995. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46120802.


The Impact of Genetic Mutations on the Efficacy of Immunotherapies in Lung Cancer.

Lui K, Cheung K, Ng W, Wang Y, Au D, Cho W Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596025 PMC: 11594099. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211954.


Vitiligo-like Lesions as a Predictor of Response to Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comprehensive Review and Case Series from a University Center.

Coelho J, Romao R, Sousa M, Azevedo S, Fidalgo P, Araujo A Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(2):1113-1128.

PMID: 38392077 PMC: 10887781. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020083.

References
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

2.
Nicholson A, Tsao M, Beasley M, Borczuk A, Brambilla E, Cooper W . The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 17(3):362-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003. View

3.
Chambers C, Kuhns M, Egen J, Allison J . CTLA-4-mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001; 19:565-94. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.565. View

4.
Baumeister S, Freeman G, Dranoff G, Sharpe A . Coinhibitory Pathways in Immunotherapy for Cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2016; 34:539-73. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112049. View

5.
Zarour H . Reversing T-cell Dysfunction and Exhaustion in Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(8):1856-64. PMC: 4872712. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1849. View