» Articles » PMID: 37899992

Defining Current Patterns of Blood Product Use During Intensive Induction Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2023 Oct 30
PMID 37899992
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Blood product transfusion retains a critical role in the supportive care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Whereas previous studies have shown increased transfusion dependency to portend inferior outcome, predictive factors of an increased transfusion burden and the prognostic impact of transfusion support have not been assessed recently.

Methods/patients: We performed a retrospective analysis on a recent cohort of patients given intensive induction chemotherapy in 2014-2022.

Results: The analysis comprised 180 patients with a median age of 57 years with 80% designated as de novo AML. Fifty-four patients (31%) were mutated, and 73 patients (42%) harbored . Favorable risk and intermediate risk ELN 2017 patients accounted for 43% and 34% of patients, respectively. The median number of red blood cell (RBC) and platelet units given during induction were 9 and 7 units, respectively. Seventeen patients (9%) received cryoprecipitate, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was given to 12 patients (7%). Lower initial hemoglobin and platelet levels were predictive of increased use of RBC ( < 0.0001) and platelet transfusions ( < 0.0001). FFP was significantly associated with induction related mortality (42% vs. 5%; < 0.0001) and with (72% vs. 28%; = 0.004). Blood group AB experienced improved mean overall survival compared to blood group O patients (4.1 years vs. 2.8 years; = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, increased number of FFP (hazard ratio [HR], 4.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-8.6; < 0.001) and RBC units (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8; = 0.008) given was associated with inferior survival.

Conclusion: Transfusion needs during induction crucially impact the clinical trajectory of AML patients.

Citing Articles

Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Xu X, Liu R, Chen H, Yang R, Gao G, He A Ther Adv Hematol. 2025; 16():20406207241311776.

PMID: 39777217 PMC: 11705358. DOI: 10.1177/20406207241311776.

References
1.
Evers D, Middelburg R, de Haas M, Zalpuri S, de Vooght K, van de Kerkhof D . Red-blood-cell alloimmunisation in relation to antigens' exposure and their immunogenicity: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2016; 3(6):e284-92. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30019-9. View

2.
Zimring J, Welniak L, Semple J, Ness P, Slichter S, Spitalnik S . Current problems and future directions of transfusion-induced alloimmunization: summary of an NHLBI working group. Transfusion. 2011; 51(2):435-41. PMC: 7003556. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03024.x. View

3.
Wei A, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, DiNardo C, Novak J, Laribi K . Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 2020; 135(24):2137-2145. PMC: 7290090. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020004856. View

4.
Meany D, Chan D . Aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers. Clin Proteomics. 2011; 8(1):7. PMC: 3170274. DOI: 10.1186/1559-0275-8-7. View

5.
Arber D, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz M, Le Beau M . The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016; 127(20):2391-405. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. View