State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging

Overview

Journal Sisli Etfal Hastan Tıp Bul

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Oct 30

PMID 37899806

Authors

Hakan Ayyildiz

Artur Salmaslioglu

Atadan Tunaci

Sukru Mehmet Erturk

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. In addition to methods such as prostate-specific antigen test, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging has an important role for accurate and reproducible diagnosis. However, guidance in targeted biopsies and recent use in determining localization for treatment increase its importance. Due to technical difficulties, patient tolerance, and differences in interpretation, the prostate imaging reporting and data system recommends preparations for the patient and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. However, techniques continue to be developed to improve the diagnosis rate and image quality. In our article, patient preparation before imaging and techniques were tried to be discussed in detail. In addition, current approaches in biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics and new techniques such as T1 and T2 mapping will be mentioned.

References

Rosenkrantz A, Parikh N, Kierans A, Kong M, Babb J, Taneja S . Prostate Cancer Detection Using Computed Very High b-value Diffusion-weighted Imaging: How High Should We Go?. Acad Radiol. 2016; 23(6):704-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.003. View

Sharif-Afshar A, Feng T, Koopman S, Nguyen C, Li Q, Shkolyar E . Impact of post prostate biopsy hemorrhage on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Can J Urol. 2015; 22(2):7698-702. View

Toivonen J, Merisaari H, Pesola M, Taimen P, Bostrom P, Pahikkala T . Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 74(4):1116-24. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25482. View

Ahmed H, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown L, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar M . Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017; 389(10071):815-822. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. View

Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Yamashita T, Egashira N . Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology. 2008; 248(2):531-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482070157. View

Vural M, Ertas G, Onay A, Acar O, Esen T, Saglican Y . Conspicuity of peripheral zone prostate cancer on computed diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison of cDWI1500, cDWI2000, and cDWI3000. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:768291. PMC: 4267000. DOI: 10.1155/2014/768291. View

Greenberg J, Koller C, Casado C, Triche B, Krane L . A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol. 2022; 14:17562872221096377. PMC: 9073105. DOI: 10.1177/17562872221096377. View

Tirumani S, Suh C, Kim K, Shinagare A, Ramaiya N, Fennessy F . Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer. Clin Radiol. 2019; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.142. View

Lee G, Oto A, Giurcanu M . Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review. Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4). PMC: 9030903. DOI: 10.3390/life12040569. View

10.

Suo S, Chen X, Wu L, Zhang X, Yao Q, Fan Y . Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 32(5):421-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.015. View

11.

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

12.

Hepp T, Kalmbach L, Kolb M, Martirosian P, Hilbert T, Thaiss W . T2 mapping for the characterization of prostate lesions. World J Urol. 2022; 40(6):1455-1461. PMC: 9166840. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03991-8. View

13.

Roethke M, Kuru T, Radbruch A, Hadaschik B, Schlemmer H . Prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: Is administration of hyoscine-N-butyl-bromide mandatory?. World J Radiol. 2013; 5(7):259-63. PMC: 3730080. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i7.259. View

14.

Turkbey B, Merino M, Gallardo E, Shah V, Aras O, Bernardo M . Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 39(6):1443-8. PMC: 4016166. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24317. View

15.

Ullrich T, Quentin M, Schmaltz A, Arsov C, Rubbert C, Blondin D . Hyoscine butylbromide significantly decreases motion artefacts and allows better delineation of anatomic structures in mp-MRI of the prostate. Eur Radiol. 2017; 28(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4940-7. View

16.

Plodeck V, Radosa C, Hubner H, Baldus C, Borkowetz A, Thomas C . Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality?. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(12):4244-4251. PMC: 8260527. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02600-9. View

17.

De Marini P, Cazzato R, Garnon J, Shaygi B, Koch G, Auloge P . Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation technical updates and literature review. BJR Open. 2020; 1(1):20180043. PMC: 7592492. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180043. View

18.

Tamada T, Ream J, Doshi A, Taneja S, Rosenkrantz A . Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate at 3 Tesla: Comparison With Standard Echo-Planar Imaging Technique for Image Quality and Tumor Assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017; 41(6):949-956. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000634. View

19.

Bao J, Wang X, Hu C, Hou J, Dong F, Guo L . Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol Open. 2017; 4:123-128. PMC: 5633348. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2017.08.003. View

20.

Barentsz J, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G . ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(4):746-57. PMC: 3297750. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y. View