» Articles » PMID: 37898968

Mini-augmented Glenoid Baseplate and Mini-humeral Tray Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Comparisons: Two-year Clinical Outcomes

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Oct 29
PMID 37898968
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival.

Methods: Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA.

Results: Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1.

Conclusion: The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.

Citing Articles

"Surviving the dip" after subacromial balloon spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tear treatment: a retrospective case series.

Sirignano M, Nyland J, Krupp R Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):1.

PMID: 39540990 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04140-0.


A two-year comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty mini-humeral tray and augmented mini-glenoid baseplate implants vs. standard implants.

Krupp R, OGrady C, Werner B, Wiater J, Nyland J, Duquin T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(5):1925-1935.

PMID: 38523239 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05276-8.

References
1.
Sears B, Johnston P, Ramsey M, Williams G . Glenoid bone loss in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20(9):604-13. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604. View

2.
Friedman L, Garrigues G . Management of Humeral and Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(17):e846-e859. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00964. View

3.
Neer 2nd C, Morrison D . Glenoid bone-grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(8):1154-62. View

4.
Gerber C, Pennington S, Nyffeler R . Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17(5):284-95. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200905000-00003. View

5.
Nicholson G, Strauss E, Sherman S . Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(9):2521-30. PMC: 3148378. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1720-y. View