» Articles » PMID: 37894010

Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experience Regarding Slow Lorises in Southern Thailand: Coexistence in a Developed Landscape

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Oct 28
PMID 37894010
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural landscapes are being converted for agriculture and other human uses across Asia and this development presents potential threats for specialist species of primates, like the Endangered slow lorises of Thailand ( and ). It is crucial to understand the interface between humans and slow lorises in order to conserve these primates. Local ecological knowledge provides valuable information about these cryptic nocturnal species. We conducted 36 semi-structured interviews in Khao Lak, in southern Thailand, asking (1) where slow lorises were seen, (2) what they were doing, (3) how often people see slow lorises, and (4) what people knew about them. We converted the interviews to free lists and determined the importance of key words. Our results show that the informants saw lorises frequently in six general locations: forests/trees (58%), electric wires (47%), towns/villages (36%), plantations (33%), homesteads (28%), and roads (17%). The most prominent places were forests/trees, wires, and plantations. Eleven key concepts defined local beliefs, with the most prominent being that lorises are awake at night (69%), eat fruit (42%), are not aggressive (25%), are bad omens (25%), and there used to be more of them (25%). Due to a minimal presence of persecution or exploitation of slow lorises by humans in the study area and general tolerance in the face of competition for the same resources and spaces, we suggest that, despite extensive persecution for the illegal photo prop trade in nearby Phuket, the people of Khao Lak seem to live in a state of passive coexistence with slow lorises. However, we did find some evidence that the pet and photo prop trade are still present in the area. It is crucial that coexistence be struck within the context of deforestation and urbanization so that conservation initiatives can take place within the community to further improve the lives of humans and the status of lorises.

Citing Articles

Local Voices: Perspectives from the Local Community on the Primates of Kakamega Forest, Western Kenya.

Ikhuluru W, Imboma M, Liseche S, Milemele M, Shilabiga S, Cords M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(22).

PMID: 38003101 PMC: 10668696. DOI: 10.3390/ani13223483.

References
1.
Estrada A, Garber P . Principal Drivers and Conservation Solutions to the Impending Primate Extinction Crisis: Introduction to the Special Issue. Int J Primatol. 2022; 43(1):1-14. PMC: 8853428. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-022-00283-1. View

2.
Franquesa-Soler M, Jorge-Sales L, Aristizabal J, Moreno-Casasola P, Serio-Silva J . Evidence-based conservation education in Mexican communities: Connecting arts and science. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228382. PMC: 6999903. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228382. View

3.
Papworth S, Milner-Gulland E, Slocombe K . The natural place to begin: the ethnoprimatology of the Waorani. Am J Primatol. 2013; 75(11):1117-28. PMC: 4230474. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22173. View

4.
Wang M, Carrasco L, Edwards D . Reconciling Rubber Expansion with Biodiversity Conservation. Curr Biol. 2020; 30(19):3825-3832.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.014. View

5.
Pliosungnoen M, Gale G, Savini T . Density and microhabitat use of Bengal slow loris in primary forest and non-native plantation forest. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72(12):1108-17. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20875. View