» Articles » PMID: 37893421

Portable Negative Pressure Wound Dressing in Oncoplastic Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Valid Ally

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 28
PMID 37893421
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: The use of oncoplastic techniques has spread widely in the last decade, with an expansion of the indications and demonstration of excellent oncological safety profiles. A potential downside may be the increased complication rates, which could influence the timing of adjuvant therapy. To date, there is increasing evidence that negative pressure therapy on closed wounds can reduce complication rates after surgery. From this perspective, we tested the use of portable negative pressure wound dressings (NPWDs) in oncoplastic surgery to minimize early post-operative admissions to the outpatient clinic and prevent surgical complications. An observational prospective cohort study was conducted on a population of patients who underwent quadrantectomy and wise-pattern reduction mammoplasty for breast cancer. The primary objective of the study is represented by the evaluation of the impact of NPWD on post-operative outcomes in an oncoplastic surgery setting. Patients enrolled between January 2021 and January 2023 were divided into two groups, the conventional dressing (CD) group and the NPWD group, by a simple randomization list. : A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 52 in the CD group and 48 in the NPWD group. The use of NPWD significantly reduced the wound dehiscence rate (2.0% vs. 7.7% = 0.002) and the number of one-month postoperative admissions to our clinic (3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 5.7 ± 1.3 = 0.0009). Although not significant, it is possible to note a trend of reduction of clinically relevant postoperative total complications in patients treated with NPWDs. : NPWDs may represent a useful tool in the post-surgical management of complex oncoplastic procedures, ensuring less wound dehiscence. Furthermore, the use of these dressings led to a significant reduction in admissions to the clinic, promoting a lower use of resources by hospitals and effective prevention of possible complications.

Citing Articles

Randomized controlled trial of bromelain and alpha-lipoic acid in breast conservative surgery.

Sgaramella L, Pasculli A, Moschetta M, Puntillo F, Dicillo P, Clemente L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4899.

PMID: 39929877 PMC: 11811023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86651-2.


Exploring Reverse Sural Flap Necrosis in Lupus-like Syndrome: Challenges and Strategies in Lower Limb Reconstruction-A Case Presentation.

Ceccaroni A, Cuomo R, Pentangelo P, Gentile A, Marra C, Rozen W Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768932 PMC: 11678630. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122053.


Acellular dermal matrix in breast augmentation surgery: A systematic review.

Marra C, Cuomo R, Ceccaroni A, Pentangelo P, Alfano C JPRAS Open. 2024; 40:111-117.

PMID: 38854623 PMC: 11156703. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.02.004.


Evaluating Artificial Intelligence's Role in Teaching the Reporting and Interpretation of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Preoperative Planning of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.

Lim B, Cevik J, Seth I, Sofiadellis F, Ross R, Rozen W JPRAS Open. 2024; 40:273-285.

PMID: 38708385 PMC: 11067004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.03.010.

References
1.
Chatterjee A, Gass J, Patel K, Holmes D, Kopkash K, Peiris L . A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26(11):3436-3444. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07345-4. View

2.
Ritter M, Oberhauser I, Montagna G, Zehnpfennig L, Schaefer K, Ling B . Comparison of patient-reported outcomes among different types of oncoplastic breast surgery procedures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75(9):3068-3077. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.051. View

3.
Scherer S, Pietramaggiori G, Mathews J, Orgill D . Short periodic applications of the vacuum-assisted closure device cause an extended tissue response in the diabetic mouse model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(5):1458-1465. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bbc829. View

4.
Regnault P . Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976; 3(2):193-203. View

5.
Danino A, Coeugniet E . Letters to the editor: negative pressure dressing: some background to a monopole business. Eplasty. 2013; 8:e6. PMC: 2206001. View