» Articles » PMID: 37892322

Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Oct 28
PMID 37892322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

All societies should carefully address the child abuse and neglect phenomenon due to its acute and chronic sequelae. Even if artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in this field could be helpful, the state of the art of this implementation is not known. No studies have comprehensively reviewed the types of AI models that have been developed/validated. Furthermore, no indications about the risk of bias in these studies are available. For these reasons, the authors conducted a systematic review of the PubMed database to answer the following questions: "what is the state of the art about the development and/or validation of AI predictive models useful to contrast child abuse and neglect phenomenon?"; "which is the risk of bias of the included articles?". The inclusion criteria were: articles written in English and dated from January 1985 to 31 March 2023; publications that used a medical and/or protective service dataset to develop and/or validate AI prediction models. The reviewers screened 413 articles. Among them, seven papers were included. Their analysis showed that: the types of input data were heterogeneous; artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and natural language processing were used; the datasets had a median size of 2600 cases; the risk of bias was high for all studies. The results of the review pointed out that the implementation of AI in the child abuse and neglect field lagged compared to other medical fields. Furthermore, the evaluation of the risk of bias suggested that future studies should provide an appropriate choice of sample size, validation, and management of overfitting, optimism, and missing data.

Citing Articles

Genetics, Epigenetics, and the Environment: Are Precision Medicine, Provider Compassion, and Social Justice Effective Public Health Measures to Mitigate Disease Risk and Severity?.

Iannaccone P, Ryznar R, Van Winkle L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(11).

PMID: 39595789 PMC: 11593770. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21111522.


Fostering Tomorrow: Uniting Artificial Intelligence and Social Pediatrics for Comprehensive Child Well-being.

Gulsen M, Yalcin S Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024; 59(4):345-352.

PMID: 39110287 PMC: 11332429. DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24076.

References
1.
Adams J, Farst K, Kellogg N . Interpretation of Medical Findings in Suspected Child Sexual Abuse: An Update for 2018. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018; 31(3):225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.12.011. View

2.
White I, Royston P, Wood A . Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011; 30(4):377-99. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4067. View

3.
Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, Biviji M, Campeau N, Venugopal V . Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018; 392(10162):2388-2396. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3. View

4.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, Ko J, Swetter S, Blau H . Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017; 542(7639):115-118. PMC: 8382232. DOI: 10.1038/nature21056. View

5.
Brown S . Ethical challenges in child abuse: what is the harm of a misdiagnosis?. Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51(6):1070-1075. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04845-4. View