» Articles » PMID: 37889335

Brain Blood Flow Pulse Analysis May Help to Recognize Individuals Who Suffer from Hydrocephalus

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2023 Oct 27
PMID 37889335
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is often associated with altered cerebral blood flow. Recent research with the use of the ultrasonic method suggests specific changes in the shape of cardiac-related cerebral arterial blood volume (CBV) pulses in NPH patients. Our study aims to provide a quantitative analysis of the shape of CBV pulses, estimated based on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in NPH patients and healthy individuals.

Methods: The CBV pulses were estimated using TCD cerebral blood flow velocity signals recorded from probable NPH adults and age-matched healthy individuals at rest. The shape of the CBV pulses was compared to a triangular shape with 27 similarity parameters calculated for every reliable CBV pulse and compared between patients and volunteers. The diagnostic accuracy of the most prominent parameter for NPH classification was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: The similarity parameters were calculated for 31 probable NPH patients (age: 59 years (IQR: 47, 67 years), 14 females) and 23 healthy volunteers (age: 54 years (IQR: 43, 61 years), 18 females). Eighteen of 27 parameters were different between healthy individuals and NPH patients (p < 0.05). The most prominent differences were found for the ascending slope of the CBV pulse with the AUC equal to 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.97, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that in NPH, the ascending slope of the CBV pulse had a slower rise, was more like a straight line, and generally was less convex than in volunteers. Prospective research is required to verify the clinical utility of these findings.

Citing Articles

Why Intracranial Compliance Is Not Utilized as a Common Practical Tool in Clinical Practice.

Gholampour S Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38002083 PMC: 10669292. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113083.

References
1.
Avezaat C, van Eijndhoven J . The role of the pulsatile pressure variations in intracranial pressure monitoring. Neurosurg Rev. 1986; 9(1-2):113-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF01743061. View

2.
Bakker S, Boon A, Wijnhoud A, Dippel D, Delwel E, Koudstaal P . Cerebral hemodynamics before and after shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002; 106(3):123-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01329.x. View

3.
Boon A, Tans J, Delwel E, Egeler-Peerdeman S, Hanlo P, Wurzer H . Dutch Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90(2):221-6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0221. View

4.
Cagnin A, Simioni M, Tagliapietra M, Citton V, Pompanin S, Della Puppa A . A Simplified Callosal Angle Measure Best Differentiates Idiopathic-Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus from Neurodegenerative Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015; 46(4):1033-8. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150107. View

5.
Carrera E, Kim D, Castellani G, Zweifel C, Czosnyka Z, Kasparowicz M . What shapes pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure?. J Neurotrauma. 2009; 27(2):317-24. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.0951. View