» Articles » PMID: 37888528

Perceptions of Cheating and Doping in E-Cycling

Overview
Journal Sports (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Oct 27
PMID 37888528
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

E-cycling is a growing area of cycling appealing to competitive cyclists and fitness enthusiasts. Zwift is the most popular e-cycling platform, with approx. 1 million subscribers and is a virtual environment that hosts regular races, including the UCI e-cycling world championships. The popularity of Zwift has given rise to cases of cheating and hacking the system to gain an advantage in e-racing. As a result, some high-profile professional riders have faced bans. We set out to understand the thoughts and concerns e-cyclists have about cheating, hacking, and doping in e-cycling. A total of 337 females and 1130 males were recruited over a 7-week period via social networking sites to complete an online survey. Forty-four per cent had experienced cheating during e-racing, which made them feel angry, annoyed, disappointed, and cheated. However, 15% of those who experienced cheating said they did not care, possibly because many see e-racing as a game or training tool rather than a competitive event. Eighty-seven per cent of participants were in favour of enforcing a ban on cheaters in e-cycling, while 34% wanted cheaters to be banned during in-person cycling events too. Results indicate that many e-cyclists have experienced cheating and would like clearer rules and bans for cheaters during e-races.

Citing Articles

Training, environmental and nutritional practices in indoor cycling: an explorative cross-sectional questionnaire analysis.

Peeters W, Coussens A, Spears I, Jeffries O Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1433368.

PMID: 39465206 PMC: 11502339. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1433368.

References
1.
McIlroy B, Passfield L, Holmberg H, Sperlich B . Virtual Training of Endurance Cycling - A Summary of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:631101. PMC: 7969501. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.631101. View

2.
Mahendru D, Kumaravel J, Mahalmani V, Medhi B . Athlete Biological Passport: Need and Challenges. Indian J Orthop. 2020; 54(3):264-270. PMC: 7205923. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00040-7. View

3.
Lentillon-Kaestner V, Hagger M, Hardcastle S . Health and doping in elite-level cycling. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 22(5):596-606. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01281.x. View

4.
Westmattelmann D, Dreiskamper D, Strauss B, Schewe G, Plass J . Perception of the Current Anti-doping Regime - A Quantitative Study Among German Top-Level Cyclists and Track and Field Athletes. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1890. PMC: 6198251. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01890. View

5.
Zandonai T, Peiro A, Covelli C, de la Torre X, Botre F . Tramadol and Cycling: Is It the End of a "Painful" Relationship? An Insight From 60,802 Doping-Control Samples From 2012 to 2020. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022; 18(1):95-98. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0243. View