» Articles » PMID: 37888525

From Incremental Test to Continuous Running at Fixed Lactate Thresholds: Individual Responses on %VO, %HR, Lactate Accumulation, and RPE

Overview
Journal Sports (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Oct 27
PMID 37888525
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With Norway's successes in middle and long-distance running, lactate-guided threshold training has regained importance in recent years. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the individual responses on common monitoring parameters based on a lactate-guided conventional training method. In total, 15 trained runners (10 males, 5 females; 18.6 ± 3.3 years; VO: 59.3 ± 5.9 mL kg min) completed a 40-min continuous running session at a fixed lactate threshold load of 2 mmol L. Lactate (La), oxygen uptake (VO), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. The chosen workload led to lactate values of 2.85 ± 0.56 mmol L (range: 1.90-3.80), a percentage of VO utilization (%VO) of 79.2 ± 2.5% (range: 74.9-83.8), a percentage of HR utilization (%HR) of 92.2 ± 2.5% (range: 88.1-95.3), and an RPE of 6.1 ± 1.9 (range: 3-10) at the end of the running session. Thereby, the individual responses differed considerably. These results indicate that a conventional continuous training method based on a fixed lactate threshold can lead to different individual responses, potentially resulting in various physiological impacts. Moreover, correlation analyses suggest that athletes with higher lactate threshold performance levels must choose their intensity in continuous training methods more conservatively (lower percentage intensity based on a fixed threshold) to avoid eliciting excessively strong metabolic responses.

Citing Articles

Correlation properties of heart rate variability for exercise prescription during prolonged running at constant speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.

Gronwald T, Horn L, Schaffarczyk M, Hoos O Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(11):1539-1551.

PMID: 39300759 PMC: 11534628. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12175.

References
1.
Jones A, Kirby B, Clark I, Rice H, Fulkerson E, Wylie L . Physiological demands of running at 2-hour marathon race pace. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020; 130(2):369-379. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00647.2020. View

2.
Morgan D, Martin P, Krahenbuhl G . Factors affecting running economy. Sports Med. 1989; 7(5):310-30. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198907050-00003. View

3.
Jamnick N, Pettitt R, Granata C, Pyne D, Bishop D . An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity. Sports Med. 2020; 50(10):1729-1756. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8. View

4.
Konopka M, Zeegers M, Solberg P, Delhaije L, Meeusen R, Ruigrok G . Factors associated with high-level endurance performance: An expert consensus derived via the Delphi technique. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0279492. PMC: 9794057. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279492. View

5.
Roecker K, Schotte O, Niess A, Horstmann T, Dickhuth H . Predicting competition performance in long-distance running by means of a treadmill test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(10):1552-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199810000-00014. View