» Articles » PMID: 37886284

Current Experiences, Expectations, and Future Roles of Faculty Development

Overview
Journal Med Sci Educ
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Oct 27
PMID 37886284
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There is complexity to the success of faculty development (FD) programs at the departmental level, and many of the contributing factors can range from the individual to systems levels. The purpose of this study is to explore faculty perception of what FD encompasses, as well as their past/current experiences with FD, and perceptions regarding the importance, barriers, and facilitators to participating in FD.

Methods: This is a single center, qualitative descriptive study guided through a social constructionist perspective. Faculty from a pediatrics department were asked to participate in 1-h focus groups of 4-5 faculty per group. All sessions were done virtually and audio-recorded for transcription. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data.

Results: Overall, 5 major themes were identified: (1) purpose/meaning of FD for faculty, (2) perceptions of faculty regarding FD, (3) challenges that faculty encounter with FD, (4) designing and delivering FD to faculty, and (5) comparing FD and continuing professional development (CPD). Some of the main findings included (a) creating flexible and personalized FD curricula, (b) department focusing on bringing the faculty together as a community, and (c) department developing a broader definition of FD that could be used as a reference point in the whole department.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that barriers and challenges for accessing and making the most of FD opportunities still persist. Going forward, departments interested in improving their FD initiatives should focus on individualized, flexible, and technology enhanced FD approaches that motivate participation.

Citing Articles

Needs and gaps of faculty development for medical schools.

Im J, Kang W, Lee S, Jeong D, Kim D, Lim M Korean J Med Educ. 2024; 36(2):189-201.

PMID: 38835311 PMC: 11150933. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2024.295.

References
1.
Sandi G, Chubinskaya S . A Faculty Development Model that Promotes Success of Early Career Faculty in Academic Medicine. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2020; 40(1):69-72. DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000282. View

2.
Berk R, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo T . Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2004; 80(1):66-71. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00017. View

3.
Damp J, Dewey C, Wells Q, Horn L, Kroop S, Mendes L . Faculty Development on Clinical Teaching Skills: An Effective Model for the Busy Clinician. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018; 3. PMC: 5757630. DOI: 10.4137/JMECD.S40798. View

4.
Steinert Y . Perspectives on faculty development: aiming for 6/6 by 2020. Perspect Med Educ. 2013; 1(1):31-42. PMC: 3540386. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-012-0006-3. View

5.
Valanci-Aroesty S, Wong K, Feldman L, Fiore Jr J, Lee L, Fried G . Identifying optimal program structure, motivations for and barriers to peer coaching participation for surgeons in practice: a qualitative synthesis. Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(8):4738-4749. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07968-9. View