» Articles » PMID: 37884837

Jail Healthcare Staffing in the US Southeast: a Cross-Sectional Survey

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 26
PMID 37884837
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Jails annually incarcerate millions of people with health problems, yet jail healthcare services have not been well described.

Objective: To describe jail healthcare staffing.

Design: Phone-administered survey conducted October 2020 to May 2021.

Setting: County jails in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama.

Participants: Jail personnel "most knowledgeable" about jail healthcare.

Main Measures: Weekly on-site healthcare coverage rate (hours per 100 incarcerated person-weeks [IPWs]) by personnel type; telemedicine rates and detention officers' healthcare duties.

Key Results: Survey response rate was 73% (254/346). Among surveyed jails, 71% had on-site non-psychiatric providers (e.g., physicians, physician assistants) (median of 3.3 h per 100 IPWs); 90% had on-site nursing (median of 57.0 h per 100 IPWs) including 50% with on-site registered nurses (median of 25 h per 100 IPWs) and 70% with on-site licensed practical nurses (median of 52 h per 100 IPWs); 9% had on-site psychiatric providers (median of 1.6 h per 100 PWs). Telemedicine was used for primary care in 13% of jails (median 2.1 h per 100 IPW); for mental healthcare in 55% (median 2.1 h per 100 IPW); and for other specialties in 5% (median 1.0 h per 100 IPW). In 81% of jails, officers conducted medical intake and in 58% assessed urgency of medical requests (i.e., "sick call"). The number of officers' healthcare responsibilities increased inversely with weekly nursing coverage.

Conclusions: Nearly 30% of surveyed jails routinely lacked on-site healthcare providers and in most other jails providers' on-site presence was modest. Jails relied heavily on LPNs and officers for care, resulting in missed opportunities for care and potentially endangering incarcerated persons.

Citing Articles

"It's easier to take a pill than fix a problem:" qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to antimicrobial stewardship program implementation in carceral settings.

Tenner R, Grussing E, Manning D, Ngassa Y, Berg J, Vazquez G BMC Glob Public Health. 2024; 2(1):59.

PMID: 39681969 PMC: 11622897. DOI: 10.1186/s44263-024-00090-1.


Health equity for people living in correctional facilities: Addressing bias, stigma, and dehumanization.

Reagan L, Kitt-Lewis E, Loeb S, Shelton D, Zucker D Res Nurs Health. 2024; 47(4):359-365.

PMID: 38877979 PMC: 11534346. DOI: 10.1002/nur.22405.

References
1.
Krsak M, Montague B, Trowbridge P, Johnson S, Binswanger I . Opioid Use and Chronic Infections: The Value of Addressing the Syndemic in Correctional Settings Via Telemedicine Guidance and Broader Use of Long-Acting Medications. J Infect Dis. 2020; 222(Suppl 5):S486-S493. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa001. View

2.
Camplain R, Warren M, Baldwin J, Camplain C, Fofanov V, Trotter 2nd R . Epidemiology of Incarceration: Characterizing Jail Incarceration for Public Health Research. Epidemiology. 2019; 30(4):561-568. PMC: 6559241. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001021. View

3.
Spaulding A, Perez S, Seals R, Hallman M, Kavasery R, Weiss P . Diversity of release patterns for jail detainees: implications for public health interventions. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101 Suppl 1:S347-52. PMC: 3222492. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300004. View

4.
Kendig N, Butkus R, Mathew S, Hilden D . Health Care During Incarceration: A Policy Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175(12):1742-1745. DOI: 10.7326/M22-2370. View

5.
Willgerodt M, Brock D, Maughan E . Public School Nursing Practice in the United States. J Sch Nurs. 2018; 34(3):232-244. DOI: 10.1177/1059840517752456. View