» Articles » PMID: 37884535

Characterization of Hypermetabolic Lymph Nodes After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Using PET-CT Derived Node-RADS, in Patients with Melanoma

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) in discriminating between normal, reactive, and metastatic axillary LNs in patients with melanoma who underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Patients with proven melanoma who underwent a 2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[F]-FDG PET/CT) between February and April 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Primary melanoma site, vaccination status, injection site, and 2-[F]-FDG PET/CT were used to classify axillary LNs into normal, inflammatory, and metastatic (combined classification). An adapted Node-RADS classification (A-Node-RADS) was generated based on LN anatomical characteristics on low-dose CT images and compared to the combined classification. 108 patients were included in the study (54 vaccinated). HALNs were detected in 42 patients (32.8%), of whom 97.6% were vaccinated. 172 LNs were classified as normal, 30 as inflammatory, and 14 as metastatic using the combined classification. 152, 22, 29, 12, and 1 LNs were classified A-Node-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Hence, 174, 29, and 13 LNs were deemed benign, equivocal, and metastatic. The concordance between the classifications was very good (Cohen's k: 0.91, CI 0.86-0.95; p-value < 0.0001). A-Node-RADS can assist the classification of axillary LNs in melanoma patients who underwent 2-[F]-FDG PET/CT and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Citing Articles

Validation of the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for standardized CT evaluation of regional lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Fang Y, Chen M, Zheng X, Yao Y, Huang K, Chen S Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39613956 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11234-0.


Node-RADS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance, category-wise malignancy rates, and inter-observer reliability.

Zhong J, Mao S, Chen H, Wang Y, Yin Q, Cen Q Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39505734 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11160-1.

References
1.
Arslan G, Murzoglu Altintoprak K, Kizildag Yirgin I, Atasoy M, Celik L . Diagnostic accuracy of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast MRI. Springerplus. 2016; 5(1):735. PMC: 4909659. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2419-7. View

2.
Elsholtz F, Asbach P, Haas M, Becker M, Beets-Tan R, Thoeny H . Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(8):6116-6124. PMC: 8270876. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07572-4. View

3.
Yang W, Lam W, Yu M, Cheung T, Metreweli C . Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(3):759-66. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750759. View

4.
Sadoff J, Gray G, Vandebosch A, Cardenas V, Shukarev G, Grinsztejn B . Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(23):2187-2201. PMC: 8220996. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101544. View

5.
Schwager S, Detmar M . Inflammation and Lymphatic Function. Front Immunol. 2019; 10:308. PMC: 6399417. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00308. View