» Articles » PMID: 37883371

Snacks Contribute Considerably to Total Dietary Intakes Among Adults Stratified by Glycemia in the United States

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Oct 26
PMID 37883371
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about the snacking patterns among adults with type 2 diabetes. The contribution of snacks to energy and nutrient intakes is important to further understand dietary patterns and glycemic control. The purpose of this study is to evaluate snack consumption among adults according to diabetes status in the United States. One NHANES 24-hour dietary recall for each participant collected between 2005-2016 was utilized for analysis (n = 23,708). Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences in nutrient and food groups intakes from snacks across levels of glycemic control, while controlling for age, race/ethnicity, income, marital status, and gender. Results of this analysis inform that adults with type 2 diabetes consume less energy, carbohydrates, and total sugars from snacks than adults without diabetes. Those with controlled type 2 diabetes consumed more vegetables and less fruit juice than other groups, yet adults with type 2 diabetes in general consumed more cured and luncheon meats than adults without diabetes or with prediabetes. Protein from all snacks for those without diabetes is higher than all other groups. This study elucidates common snacking patterns among US adults with diabetes and highlights the need for clinicians and policymakers to take snacking into consideration when evaluating and providing dietary recommendations.

Citing Articles

Proposed Practical Guidelines to Improve Glycaemic Management by Reducing Glycaemic Variability in People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

de Torres-Sanchez A, Ampudia-Blasco F, Murillo S, Bellido V, Amor A, Mezquita-Raya P Diabetes Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 40019699 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-025-01703-0.

References
1.
Leidy H, Carnell N, Mattes R, Campbell W . Higher protein intake preserves lean mass and satiety with weight loss in pre-obese and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15(2):421-9. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.531. View

2.
Gannon M, Nuttall F, Neil B, Westphal S . The insulin and glucose responses to meals of glucose plus various proteins in type II diabetic subjects. Metabolism. 1988; 37(11):1081-8. DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90072-8. View

3.
Ceriello A, Colagiuri S, Gerich J, Tuomilehto J . Guideline for management of postmeal glucose. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008; 18(4):S17-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.01.012. View

4.
Hebert J, Hurley T, Steck S, Miller D, Tabung F, Peterson K . Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy. Adv Nutr. 2014; 5(4):447-55. PMC: 4085192. DOI: 10.3945/an.114.006189. View

5.
Schulze M, Hoffmann K . Methodological approaches to study dietary patterns in relation to risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Br J Nutr. 2006; 95(5):860-9. DOI: 10.1079/bjn20061731. View