» Articles » PMID: 37879705

Intrauterine Device Migration into the Bladder Leading to Stones Formation

Overview
Journal BMJ Case Rep
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 25
PMID 37879705
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular method of contraception mainly used in developing countries. Perforation is one of the most serious but a rare complication secondary to the insertion of an IUD, while perforation into the intravesical organs such as the bladder is even more rare. A 30-year-old multipara in early 30s, with two previous caesarean sections (CS) and one curettage, was found to have her IUD puncturing the bladder during a cystoscopy procedure to remove her bladder stones. Transvesical migration of an IUD is an uncommon complication with a high rate of calculi formation, which is thought to be caused by the IUD's lithogenic potential. Imaging approaches such as ultrasound and pelvic X-rays are considered imperative in the accurate diagnosis. Any migrated IUD should be removed regardless of location. Prompt and continual monitoring of women using an IUD is essential and in a case where the IUD has migrated, the removal using the endoscopic approach is a safe and effective method.

Citing Articles

A Case Report of Intrauterine Device Migration: Uterine Penetration and Bladder Involvement with Secondary Stones 3 Years Post-Insertion.

Chen Z, Lv Z, Shi Y Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:1903-1907.

PMID: 39539644 PMC: 11559418. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S492865.


Migration of an intrauterine device to the posterior urethra with stone formation: a case report.

Liu C, Xia Y, Pang Q, Zhao Z, Zhao J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1449443.

PMID: 39238594 PMC: 11375611. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1449443.


Vesicovaginal fistula and bladder calculus formation secondary to long-term retention of an intrauterine device.

Goto M, Kaneko T, Yamamine N, Yanagida K, Noda M, Tokura Y IJU Case Rep. 2024; 7(5):355-358.

PMID: 39224684 PMC: 11366431. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12753.


Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Migrated in the Urinary Tract: Case Report and Extensive Literature Review.

Varlas V, Meianu A, Radoi A, Balescu I, Bacalbasa N, Varlas R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064273 PMC: 11278257. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144233.


Removal of Complete Spontaneous Migration of an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device to the Bladder by Cystoscopy.

Saputra A, Rahman M, Widyasari A Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 2024:6934178.

PMID: 38770062 PMC: 11105948. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6934178.

References
1.
Gunbey H, Tanrivermis Sayit A, Idilman I, Aksoy O . Migration of intrauterine devices with radiological findings: report on two cases. BMJ Case Rep. 2014; 2014. PMC: 4024539. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202522. View

2.
Gharbi M, Chakroun M, Chaker K, Mokadem S, Ayed H, Chebil M . Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in stone formation: About a case report. Urol Case Rep. 2019; 23:65-66. PMC: 6329691. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.01.009. View

3.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D . Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2018; 7:19-32. PMC: 5683155. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. View

4.
Bashir B, Atobatele M, Illo H . Bladder calculus resulting from an intravesical translocation of intrauterine contraceptive device in a postmenopausal woman. Niger J Med. 2018; 25(1):90-2. View

5.
Kart M, Gulecen T, Ustuner M, Ciftci S, Yavuz U, Ozkurkcugil C . Intravesical Migration of Missed Intrauterine Device Associated with Stone Formation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Urol. 2015; 2015:581697. PMC: 4515526. DOI: 10.1155/2015/581697. View