Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography Or Intravascular Ultrasound
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear.
Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions.
Methods: This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
Results: In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03).
Conclusions: Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).
Viana S, Zhang D Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 25(12):443.
PMID: 39742247 PMC: 11683718. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2512443.
Li J, Wang X, Chen R, Zhou P, Liu C, Song L Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 25(12):444.
PMID: 39742216 PMC: 11683697. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2512444.
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.
Almajid F, Kang D, Ahn J, Park S, Park D EuroIntervention. 2024; 20(19):e1202-e1216.
PMID: 39374089 PMC: 11443254. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912.
Widespread Use of Imaging-Guided PCI in Asia: Time for Extended Application.
Kim Y, Kim J, Hong S, Kim H, Lee H, Yoon H JACC Asia. 2024; 4(9):639-656.
PMID: 39371623 PMC: 11450943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.07.003.
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.
Savage P, Cox B, Shahmohammadi M, Kelly B, Menown I Adv Ther. 2024; 41(7):2606-2634.
PMID: 38743242 PMC: 11213809. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02877-y.