Blastocyst Quality and Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes: a Multinational Multicentre Observational Study

Overview

Journal Hum Reprod

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2023 Oct 25

PMID 37877423

Authors

Haowen Zou

James M Kemper

Elizabeth R Hammond

Fengqin Xu

Gensheng Liu

Lintao Xue

Xiaohong Bai

Hongqing Liao

Songguo Xue

Shuqin Zhao

Lan Xia

Jean Scott

Vincent Chapple

Masoud Afnan

Dean E Morbeck

Ben W J Mol

Yanhe Liu

Rui Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Question: Does the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts?

Summary Answer: The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14% for very low-grade blastocysts) compared to 44% for single good-grade blastocysts, but does not lead to more adverse perinatal outcomes.

What Is Known Already: It is known that low-grade blastocysts can result in live births. However, the current studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and single-centre designs. Furthermore, evidence on perinatal outcomes after transferring low-grade blastocysts is limited.

Study Design, Size, Duration: We conducted a multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study of 10 018 women undergoing 10 964 single blastocyst transfer cycles between 2009 and 2020 from 14 clinics across Australia, China, and New Zealand.

Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Blastocysts were graded individually based on assessment of the morphology and development of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), and were grouped into three quality categories: good- (AB, AB, or BA), moderate- (BB), and low-grade (grade C for ICM or TE) blastocysts. CC blastocysts were individually grouped as very low-grade blastocysts. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the association between blastocyst quality and live birth as well as other reproductive outcomes. Binomial, multinomial logistic, or linear regression was used to investigate the association between blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (aOR), adjusted regression coefficient, and their 95% CIs are presented. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Main Results And The Role Of Chance: There were 4386 good-grade blastocysts, 3735 moderate-grade blastocysts, and 2843 low-grade blastocysts were included in the analysis, for which the live birth rates were 44.4%, 38.6%, and 30.2%, respectively. Compared to good-grade blastocysts, the live birth rate of low-grade blastocysts was significantly lower (aOR of 0.48 (0.41-0.55)). Very low-grade blastocysts were associated with an even lower live birth rate (aOR 0.30 (0.18-0.52)) and their absolute live birth rate was 13.7%. There were 4132 singleton live births included in the analysis of perinatal outcomes. Compared with good-grade blastocysts, low-grade blastocysts had comparable preterm birth rates (<37 weeks, aOR 1.00 (0.65-1.54)), birthweight Z-scores (adjusted regression coefficient 0.02 (0.09-0.14)), and rates of very low birth weight (<1500 g, aOR 0.84 (0.22-3.25)), low birth weight (1500-2500 g, aOR 0.96 (0.56-1.65)), high birth weight (>4500 g, aOR 0.93 (0.37-2.32)), small for gestational age (aOR 1.63 (0.91-2.93)), and large for gestational age (aOR 1.28 (0.97-1.70)).

Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Due to the nature of the retrospective design, residual confounding could not be excluded. In addition, the number of events for some perinatal outcomes was small. Between-operator and between-laboratory variations in blastocyst assessment were difficult to control.

Wider Implications Of The Findings: Patients undergoing IVF should be informed that low-grade blastocysts result in a lower live birth rate, however they do not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Further research should focus on the criteria for embryos that should not be transferred and on the follow-up of long-term outcomes of offspring.

Study Funding/competing Interest(s): H.Z. is supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. The other authors do not have competing interests to disclose.

Trial Registration Number: N/A.

Citing Articles

Application of a methodological framework for the development and multicenter validation of reliable artificial intelligence in embryo evaluation.

Gilboa D, Garg A, Shapiro M, Meseguer M, Amar Y, Lustgarten N Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):16.

PMID: 39891250 PMC: 11783712. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01351-w.

Trophectoderm, Inner Cell Mass, and Expansion Status for Live Birth Prediction After Frozen Blastocyst Transfer: The Winner Is Trophectoderm.

Bartolacci A, de Girolamo S, Solano Narduche L, Rabellotti E, De Santis L, Papaleo E Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598159 PMC: 11595274. DOI: 10.3390/life14111360.

A deep learning model for predicting blastocyst formation from cleavage-stage human embryos using time-lapse images.

Kalyani K, Deshpande P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28019.

PMID: 39543360 PMC: 11564556. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79175-8.

Quality of IVM ovarian tissue oocytes: impact of clinical, demographic, and laboratory factors.

Kashutina M, Obosyan L, Bunyaeva E, Zhernov Y, Kirillova A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(11):3079-3088.

PMID: 39349891 PMC: 11621277. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03234-2.

Perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes in fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a propensity score matching cohort study.

Chen Y, Zhang M, Gao Y, Li M, Zheng W, Guo X Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1405550.

PMID: 39092286 PMC: 11291349. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1405550.

References

Arab S, Badegiesh A, Aldhaheri S, Son W, Dahan M . What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles. Reprod Sci. 2020; 28(5):1403-1411. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00404-2. View

Gardner D, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Treff N . Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(6):727-47. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu064. View

Hu K, Zheng X, Hunt S, Li X, Li R, Mol B . Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2021(4):hoab036. PMC: 8849119. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab036. View

Storr A, Venetis C, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W . Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod. 2016; 32(2):307-314. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. View

Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P . Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(8):1685-95. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew127. View

Guo N, Deng T, Jiang H, Gong Y, Yin L, Ren X . Association between blastocyst morphology and live birth rate following frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer: Results from a 5-year retrospective analysis of 2593 cryopreserved blastocysts. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020; 46(11):2314-2322. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14423. View

Ganer Herman H, Volodarsky-Perel A, Nu T, Machado-Gedeon A, Cui Y, Shaul J . Does embryo quality at transfer affect obstetric outcomes and placental findings?. Hum Reprod. 2023; 38(5):853-859. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead045. View

Sullivan E, Wang Y, Hayward I, Chambers G, Illingworth P, McBain J . Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(12):3609-15. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des315. View

Cornelisse S, Vos M, Groenewoud H, Mastenbroek S, Ramos L, Braat D . Women's preferences concerning IVF treatment: a discrete choice experiment with particular focus on embryo transfer policy. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022(3):hoac030. PMC: 9345060. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac030. View

10.

Li M, Yin M, Wu L, Yan Z, Lyu Q, Yan Z . Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of morphologically grade CC blastocysts: are they of clinical value?. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 302(6):1511-1521. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05741-w. View

11.

. Comprehensive guidance for human embryology, andrology, and endocrinology laboratories: management and operations: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2022; 117(6):1183-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.016. View

12.

Comstock I, Kim S, Behr B, Lathi R . Increased body mass index negatively impacts blastocyst formation rate in normal responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(9):1299-304. PMC: 4595387. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0515-1. View

13.

Licciardi F, McCaffrey C, Oh C, Schmidt-Sarosi C, McCulloh D . Birth weight is associated with inner cell mass grade of blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2014; 103(2):382-7.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.039. View

14.

Munch E, Sparks A, Duran H, Van Voorhis B . Lack of carbon air filtration impacts early embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(7):1009-17. PMC: 4531868. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0495-1. View

15.

Lai I, Neal M, Gervais N, Amin S, Taerk E, Faghih M . Transfers of lower quality embryos based on morphological appearance result in appreciable live birth rates: a Canadian center's experience. F S Rep. 2021; 1(3):264-269. PMC: 8244281. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.09.003. View

16.

Vinals Gonzalez X, Odia R, Naja R, Serhal P, Saab W, Seshadri S . Euploid blastocysts implant irrespective of their morphology after NGS-(PGT-A) testing in advanced maternal age patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(8):1623-1629. PMC: 6707991. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01496-9. View

17.

Liu Y, Ong K, Korman I, Turner R, Shaker D, Zander-Fox D . The effect of day 5 blastocyst assessment timing on live birth prediction and development of a prediction algorithm. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022; 44(4):609-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.017. View

18.

Li M, Singh B, Baker V . Association between embryo morphological quality and birth weight for singletons conceived via autologous fresh embryo transfer: an analysis using Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting System. Fertil Steril. 2022; 118(4):715-723. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.017. View

19.

Rubio I, Galan A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J . Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(5):1287-1294.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738. View

20.

Bouillon C, Celton N, Kassem S, Frapsauce C, Guerif F . Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(2):197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.009. View