Do Recruitment SWAT Interventions Have an Impact on Participant Retention in Randomised Controlled Trials? A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Clin Trials

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2023 Oct 25

PMID 37877371

Authors

Catherine E Arundel

Laura Clark

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based methods for randomised controlled trial recruitment and retention are extremely valuable. Despite increased testing of these through studies within a trial, there remains limited high-certainty evidence for effective strategies. In addition, there has been little consideration as to whether recruitment interventions also have an impact on participant retention.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Studies were eligible if they were randomised controlled trials using a recruitment intervention and which also assessed the impact of this on retention at any time point. Searches were conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository. Two independent reviewers screened the search results and extracted data for eligible studies using a piloted extraction form.

Results: A total of 7815 records were identified, resulting in 10 studies being included in the review. Most studies (n = 6, 60%) focussed on the information given to participants (n = 6, 60%), with two (20%) focussing on incentives, and two focussing on trial design and recruiter interventions. Due to intervention heterogeneity, none of the interventions could be meta-analysed. Only one study found any statistically significant effect of letters including a photograph (odds ratio: 5.40, 95% CI 1.12-26.15, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Assessment of the impacts of recruitment strategies, evaluated in a SWAT, on retention of participants in the host trial remains limited. Assessment of the impact of recruitment interventions on retention is recommended to minimise future research costs and waste.

Citing Articles

Defying the odds: 30 years in AL amyloidosis research-recent barriers to clinical trial enrollment.

Sanchorawala V, Barroso B, Shelton A, Goetz E, Mendelson L, Joshi T Blood Adv. 2024; 8(22):5826-5828.

PMID: 39293090 PMC: 11609355. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014262.

The overlap between randomised evaluations of recruitment and retention interventions: An updated review of recruitment (Online Resource for Recruitment in Clinical triAls) and retention (Online Resource for Retention in Clinical triAls) literature.

Kearney A, Butlin L, Coffey T, Conway T, Cotterill S, Evans A Clin Trials. 2024; 21(5):640-649.

PMID: 38576071 PMC: 11528860. DOI: 10.1177/17407745241238444.

References

Lienard J, Quinaux E, Fabre-Guillevin E, Piedbois P, Jouhaud A, Decoster G . Impact of on-site initiation visits on patient recruitment and data quality in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Trials. 2006; 3(5):486-92. DOI: 10.1177/1740774506070807. View

Gillies K, Kearney A, Keenan C, Treweek S, Hudson J, Brueton V . Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 3:MR000032. PMC: 8092429. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3. View

Ioannidis J . Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008; 19(5):640-8. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7. View

Treweek S, Bevan S, Bower P, Campbell M, Christie J, Clarke M . Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?. Trials. 2018; 19(1):139. PMC: 5824570. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5. View

Knapp P, Mandall N, Hulse W, Roche J, Moe-Byrne T, Martin-Kerry J . Evaluating the use of multimedia information when recruiting adolescents to orthodontics research: A randomised controlled trial. J Orthod. 2021; 48(4):343-351. PMC: 8652365. DOI: 10.1177/14653125211024250. View

Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View

Heijmans N, van Lieshout J, Wensing M . Improving participation rates by providing choice of participation mode: two randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:29. PMC: 4392857. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0021-2. View

Brueton V, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I . Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (12):MR000032. PMC: 4470347. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2. View

Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F . Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2:MR000013. PMC: 7078793. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6. View

10.

McCaffery J, Mitchell A, Fairhurst C, Cockayne S, Rodgers S, Relton C . Does handwriting the name of a potential trial participant on an invitation letter improve recruitment rates? A randomised controlled study within a trial. F1000Res. 2019; 8:659. PMC: 6733374. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18939.1. View

11.

Arundel C, Jefferson L, Bailey M, Cockayne S, Hicks K, Loughrey L . A randomized, embedded trial of pre-notification of trial participation did not increase recruitment rates to a falls prevention trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016; 23(1):73-78. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12576. View

12.

Oakes A, Epstein J, Ganguly A, Park S, Evans C, Patel M . Effect of Opt-In vs Opt-Out Framing on Enrollment in a COVID-19 Surveillance Testing Program: The COVID SAFE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(6):e2112434. PMC: 8176333. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12434. View

13.

Cockayne S, Fairhurst C, Adamson J, Hewitt C, Hull R, Hicks K . An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial. Trials. 2017; 18(1):144. PMC: 5370466. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7. View

14.

Hewitt C, Kumaravel B, Dumville J, Torgerson D . Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(11):1264-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.010. View

15.

Jolly K, Sidhu M, Bower P, Madurasinghe V . Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled 'study within a trial' (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource. Trials. 2019; 20(1):453. PMC: 6657092. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3496-z. View

16.

Cook J, Cook J, Bongard E, Heneghan C, Butler C . Conditional versus non-conditional incentives to maximise return of participant completed questionnaires in clinical trials: a cluster randomised study within a trial. Trials. 2023; 24(1):710. PMC: 10629007. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07604-6. View

17.

ONeill L, Knapp P, Doyle S, Guinan E, Parker A, Segurado R . Patient and family co-developed participant information to improve recruitment rates, retention, and patient understanding in the Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophago-gastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) trial: Protocol.... HRB Open Res. 2021; 2:27. PMC: 7745189. DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12950.2. View

18.

Smith V, Clarke M, Begley C, Devane D . SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a 'site visit' intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial. Trials. 2015; 16:211. PMC: 4429599. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0732-z. View

19.

Avenell A, Grant A, McGee M, McPherson G, Campbell M, McGee M . The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention--a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design. Clin Trials. 2005; 1(6):490-8. DOI: 10.1191/1740774504cn053oa. View

20.

Aysola J, Tahirovic E, Troxel A, Asch D, Gangemi K, Hodlofski A . A Randomized Controlled Trial of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Enrollment Into a Diabetes Behavioral Intervention. Am J Health Promot. 2017; 32(3):745-752. DOI: 10.1177/0890117116671673. View