» Articles » PMID: 37874323

Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Echo-intensity is a Valid Measure of Cartilage Composition

Overview
Journal J Orthop Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Oct 24
PMID 37874323
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to create a conversion equation that accurately predicts cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 relaxation times using ultrasound echo-intensity and common participant demographics. We recruited 15 participants with a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the ages of 18 and 35 years at 1-5 years after surgery. A single investigator completed a transverse suprapatellar scan with the ACLR limb in max knee flexion to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area to assess the echo-intensity (i.e., mean gray-scale pixel value). At a separate visit, a T2 mapping sequence with the MRI beam set to an oblique angle was used to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the cartilage cross-sectional area on a single MRI slice to assess the T2 relaxation time. A stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to predict T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and common demographic variables. We created a conversion equation using the regression betas and then used an ICC and Bland-Altman plot to assess agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time. Cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity and age significantly predicted T2 relaxation time (F = 7.33, p = 0.008, R = 0.55). When using the new conversion equation to estimate T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and age, there was strong agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time (ICC = 0.84). This study provides promising preliminary data that cartilage echo-intensity combined with age can be used as a clinically accessible tool for evaluating cartilage composition.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17(4):571-82. DOI: 10.1080/10543400701329422. View

2.
Usen A, Tolu S . Factors Affecting the Femoral Cartilage Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55(2):352-359. PMC: 8046890. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00262-9. View

3.
Coleman J, Widmyer M, Leddy H, Utturkar G, Spritzer C, Moorman 3rd C . Diurnal variations in articular cartilage thickness and strain in the human knee. J Biomech. 2012; 46(3):541-7. PMC: 3552039. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.013. View

4.
Matzat S, van Tiel J, Gold G, Oei E . Quantitative MRI techniques of cartilage composition. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013; 3(3):162-74. PMC: 3701096. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.06.04. View

5.
Culvenor A, Eckstein F, Wirth W, Lohmander L, Frobell R . Loss of patellofemoral cartilage thickness over 5 years following ACL injury depends on the initial treatment strategy: results from the KANON trial. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 53(18):1168-1173. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100167. View