» Articles » PMID: 37873633

Empiric Anti-Pseudomonal β-Lactam Monotherapy Versus Fluoroquinolone Combination Therapy in Patients With Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: A Multicenter Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

Abstract

Background: There is insufficient data on the benefits of empiric antibiotic combinations for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). We aimed to investigate whether empiric anti-pseudomonal combination therapy with fluoroquinolones decreases mortality in patients with HAP.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to 16 tertiary and general hospitals in Korea between January 1 and December 31, 2019. Patients with risk factors for combination therapy were divided into anti-pseudomonal non-carbapenem β-lactam monotherapy and fluoroquinolone combination therapy groups. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias.

Results: In total, 631 patients with HAP were enrolled. Monotherapy was prescribed in 54.7% (n = 345) of the patients, and combination therapy was prescribed in 45.3% (n = 286). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (16.8% vs. 18.2%, = 0.729) or even after the PSM (17.5% vs. 18.2%, = 0.913). After the PSM, adjusted hazard ratio for 30-day mortality from the combination therapy was 1.646 (95% confidence interval, 0.782-3.461; = 0.189) in the Cox proportional hazards model. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the appropriateness of initial empiric antibiotics between the two groups (55.0% vs. 56.8%, = 0.898). The proportion of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens was high in both groups.

Conclusion: Empiric anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone combination therapy showed no survival benefit compared to β-lactam monotherapy in patients with HAP. Caution is needed regarding the routine combination of fluoroquinolones in the empiric treatment of HAP patients with a high risk of MDR.

References
1.
Assefa M . Multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial pneumonia: etiology, risk factors, and drug resistance patterns. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2022; 14(1):4. PMC: 9069761. DOI: 10.1186/s41479-022-00096-z. View

2.
Latibeaudiere R, Rosa R, Laowansiri P, Arheart K, Namias N, Munoz-Price L . Surveillance cultures growing carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii predict the development of clinical infections: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 60(3):415-22. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu847. View

3.
Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

4.
Vilella A, Seifert C . Timing and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy in newly presenting septic patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 32(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.008. View

5.
Zaragoza R, Vidal-Cortes P, Aguilar G, Borges M, Diaz E, Ferrer R . Update of the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):383. PMC: 7322703. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03091-2. View