» Articles » PMID: 37869750

PK-PD Integration of Enrofloxacin and Cefquinome Alone and in Combination Against Using an Dynamic Model

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2023 Oct 23
PMID 37869750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

is classified as a critical pathogen in both animals and humans and infections can be fatal in chickens resulting in substantial economic losses. However, the misuse of antibiotics can also lead to drug resistance and a potential transmission chain between animals and humans. Three strains with different susceptibility phenotypes were chosen to study the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) integration of enrofloxacin (ENR) and cefquinome (CEQ) alone and in combination. Checkerboard assay results indicated that the combination treatment for type strain ATCC 700603 was synergistic effect with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of ≤0.5. The other two clinical strains demonstrated an additive effect (FICI >0.5 to ≤1). Furthermore, static time-kill curves indicated that enrofloxacin and cefquinome added singly were effective in killing at concentrations of >2 MIC and ≥1 MIC, respectively. Additionally, the combination of enrofloxacin and cefquinome led to an enhanced antibacterial activity of cefquinome. The dynamic time-kill curves indicated that enrofloxacin and cefquinome had bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities, respectively at ≥1.5 mg/L (single-dose) and 4 mg/L (8 h split-dose) causing a decrease in bacterial counts of ≥4.45 and >2 log CFU/mL. Enrofloxacin possessed no bacteriostatic effects against at a constant concentration of 1× MIC. Cefquinome used in combination with 1× MIC enrofloxacin exhibited bactericidal activity at ≥4 mg/L (12 h split-dose) with reductions of ≥3.65 log CFU/mL. The PK/PD parameters were also analyzed to determine the concentration and duration of the drugs needed to reduce bacteria by 3 log CFU/mL. For enrofloxacin alone, the AUCh/MIC was 23.29 h and the C/MIC was 3.18. For cefquinome alone, the %T > MIC was 48.66 and when used in combination with enrofloxacin was 18.04. The combined use of cefquinome and enrofloxacin can increase the antibacterial activity of cefquinome against under a 12-h split-dose regimen regardless of individual drug susceptibility. The static and dynamic time-kill curves indicated that enrofloxacin exhibited concentration-dependent activity, while cefquinome exhibited time-dependent activity. In the dynamic model, enrofloxacin alone exhibited better antimicrobial effects against compared to cefquinome alone. However, the antibacterial effect of cefquinome can be enhanced by combining it with enrofloxacin. These findings suggest a potentially effective approach for combating infections.

References
1.
Nam Y, Cho S, Yang H, Park K, Jang J, Kim Y . Investigation of mutation distribution in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV genes in ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolated from blood cultures in a tertiary care university hospital in South Korea, 2005-2010. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012; 41(2):126-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.10.004. View

2.
Pallo-Zimmerman L, Byron J, Graves T . Fluoroquinolones: then and now. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2010; 32(7):E1-9. View

3.
Navon-Venezia S, Kondratyeva K, Carattoli A . Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017; 41(3):252-275. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fux013. View

4.
Odds F . Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003; 52(1):1. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg301. View

5.
Messenger K, Papich M, Blikslager A . Distribution of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite, using an in vivo ultrafiltration sampling technique after the injection of enrofloxacin to pigs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 35(5):452-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01338.x. View