» Articles » PMID: 37865619

Hoarding Titmice Predominantly Use Familiarity, and Not Recollection, when Remembering Cache Locations

Overview
Journal Anim Cogn
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Oct 21
PMID 37865619
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scatter-hoarding birds find their caches using spatial memory and have an enlarged hippocampus. Finding a cache site could be achieved using either Recollection (a discrete recalling of previously experienced information) or Familiarity (a feeling of "having encountered something before"). In humans, these two processes can be distinguished using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curves for olfactory memory in rats have shown the hippocampus is involved in Recollection, but not Familiarity. We test the hypothesis that food-hoarding birds, having a larger hippocampus, primarily use Recollection to find their caches. We validate a novel method of constructing ROC curves in humans and apply this method to cache retrieval by coal tits (Periparus ater). Both humans and birds mainly use Familiarity in finding their caches, with lower contribution of Recollection. This contribution is not significantly different from chance in birds, but a small contribution cannot be ruled out. Memory performance decreases with increasing retention interval in birds. The ecology of food-hoarding Parids makes it plausible that they mainly use Familiarity in the memory for caches. The larger hippocampus could be related to associating cache contents and temporal context with cache locations, rather than Recollection of the spatial information itself.

Citing Articles

What is the nature of cache memory in Parids? A comment on Chettih et al. 2024.

Smulders T, Cheng S Anim Cogn. 2025; 28(1):13.

PMID: 39937295 PMC: 11821683. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-025-01932-7.


Different memory systems in food-hoarding birds: A response to Pravosudov.

Smulders T, Read J Learn Behav. 2024; 52(4):293-295.

PMID: 38755512 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-024-00630-7.


Multiple cache recovery task cannot determine memory mechanisms.

Pravosudov V Learn Behav. 2023; 52(4):291-292.

PMID: 38030809 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x.

References
1.
Adams A, Santi A . Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample. Learn Behav. 2011; 39(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s13420-010-0001-7. View

2.
Basile B, Hampton R . Dissociation of active working memory and passive recognition in rhesus monkeys. Cognition. 2013; 126(3):391-6. PMC: 3558612. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.012. View

3.
Biegler R, McGregor A, Krebs J, Healy S . A larger hippocampus is associated with longer-lasting spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(12):6941-4. PMC: 34457. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.121034798. View

4.
Clayton N, Dickinson A . Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature. 1998; 395(6699):272-4. DOI: 10.1038/26216. View

5.
Feeney M, Roberts W, Sherry D . Memory for what, where, and when in the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Anim Cogn. 2009; 12(6):767-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0236-x. View