» Articles » PMID: 37860164

The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Supported Online Self-help Treatment Program for Binge-eating Disorder

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Oct 20
PMID 37860164
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Studies in transdiagnostic eating disorder (ED) samples suggest supported online self-help programs (eTherapies) are effective and may improve access to treatment; however, their evaluation in those with binge-eating disorder (BED) is limited. Given BED's high prevalence and low levels of treatment uptake, further eTherapy evaluation is needed to broaden access to effective, evidence-based treatment options. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a supported eTherapy for those with BED or subthreshold BED, and to examine symptom change across the duration of therapy.

Method: Nineteen women with BED completed a supported, 10-session Cognitive Behavioural Therapy-based eTherapy in an uncontrolled, pre-post, and 3 months follow up intervention study. Key outcomes were assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): objective binge episode (OBE) frequency and ED psychopathology. Feasibility was evaluated via program adherence and dropout, whilst acceptability was assessed through participant feedback post-treatment. Weekly symptom change (ED psychopathology) during treatment was assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination - Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS).

Results: Generalised estimating equations showed statistically and clinically significant reductions in OBEs and ED psychopathology (large effects) post-treatment, with these decreases maintained at follow up. Across weekly assessment, a marked slowing in the rate of change in ED psychopathology was observed after four sessions of the program. Program feasibility was high (i.e., 84% of content completed), as was program acceptability (i.e., 93% of participants expressed high levels of satisfaction).

Discussion: These results support the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a supported eTherapy program for those with BED and suggest the variability of symptom change across the duration of therapy. Future research should further investigate findings in an adequately powered randomised controlled trial.

Citing Articles

Framework Development for Reducing Attrition in Digital Dietary Interventions: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Wang J, Mahe J, Huo Y, Huang W, Liu X, Zhao Y J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e58735.

PMID: 39190910 PMC: 11387916. DOI: 10.2196/58735.


New understandings meet old treatments: putting a contemporary face on established protocols.

Byrne S, Fursland A J Eat Disord. 2024; 12(1):26.

PMID: 38336928 PMC: 10854196. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-00983-4.

References
1.
Linardon J, Messer M, Shatte A, Skvarc D, Rosato J, Rathgen A . Targeting dietary restraint to reduce binge eating: a randomised controlled trial of a blended internet- and smartphone app-based intervention. Psychol Med. 2021; 53(4):1277-1287. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721002786. View

2.
Carrard I, Crepin C, Rouget P, Lam T, Golay A, van der Linden M . Randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help treatment on the Internet for binge eating disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2011; 49(8):482-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.05.004. View

3.
Austin A, Flynn M, Richards K, Hodsoll J, Duarte T, Robinson P . Duration of untreated eating disorder and relationship to outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020; 29(3):329-345. DOI: 10.1002/erv.2745. View

4.
Kelders S, Kok R, Ossebaard H, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6):e152. PMC: 3510730. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2104. View

5.
Peterson C, Crosby R, Wonderlich S, Joiner T, Crow S, Mitchell J . Psychometric properties of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency. Int J Eat Disord. 2007; 40(4):386-9. DOI: 10.1002/eat.20373. View