» Articles » PMID: 37860099

Comparative Environmental Impacts and Development Benefits of Coastal Aquaculture in Three Tropical Countries: Madagascar, Tanzania and Indonesia

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 20
PMID 37860099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aquaculture is still in early development in Madagascar and Tanzania, while in Indonesia, aquaculture has a long history. In Madagascar, villagers are farming seaweed and sea cucumbers, as part of small-scale community-based aquaculture (CBA). They followed a contractual model between a private farming company and farmers. Local non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and public institutions in Madagascar jointly strive to reverse the trend of ongoing anthropogenic coastal degradation. In Tanzania, the cultivation of red seaweeds has been established for over 30 years, with declining production attributed to climate change. While shrimp farming still involves, to some extent, clearing of mangroves in Tanzania, seaweed culture has only mild impact on coastal ecosystems. Farming areas provide shelter and habitat for juvenile fish, crabs and other organisms. Therefore, NGOs ask for support to improve culture methods. Various problems and shortcomings in Indonesia have been clearly identified, including issues related to new aquaculture areas, pollutants, emerging diseases, insufficient broodstock and fry supply, as well as a lack of technology and manpower. To address these challenges and ensure the growth of aquaculture production, the government has implemented national policies and established training and broodstock centers throughout the country. In Madagascar, the CBA programme stands out as a success story and can serve as a template for other coastal regions and countries. In Tanzania, the adoption of CBA model for co-culture could be the future. In Indonesia, due to a very long coastlines and complicated legislation, IMTA seems to be particularly suitable, as successfully tested in model regions.

Citing Articles

Understanding the role of microbes in health and disease of farmed aquatic organisms.

Thompson C, Wasielesky Jr W, Landuci F, Lima M, Bacha L, Perazzolo L Mar Life Sci Technol. 2024; 6(4):579-609.

PMID: 39620093 PMC: 11602928. DOI: 10.1007/s42995-024-00248-8.

References
1.
Hennersdorf P, Kleinertz S, Theisen S, Abdul-Aziz M, Mrotzek G, Palm H . Microbial Diversity and Parasitic Load in Tropical Fish of Different Environmental Conditions. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0151594. PMC: 4809571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151594. View

2.
Dsikowitzky L, Hagemann L, Dwiyitno , Ariyani F, Irianto H, Schwarzbauer J . Complex organic pollutant mixtures originating from industrial and municipal emissions in surface waters of the megacity Jakarta-an example of a water pollution problem in emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(35):27539-27552. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0164-2. View

3.
Ruckert S, Klimpel S, Al-Quraishy S, Mehlhorn H, Palm H . Transmission of fish parasites into grouper mariculture (Serranidae: Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822)) in Lampung Bay, Indonesia. Parasitol Res. 2008; 104(3):523-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-008-1226-7. View

4.
Cordova M, Nurhati I . Major sources and monthly variations in the release of land-derived marine debris from the Greater Jakarta area, Indonesia. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18730. PMC: 6904567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55065-2. View

5.
Alfiansah Y, Peters S, Harder J, Hassenruck C, Gardes A . Structure and co-occurrence patterns of bacterial communities associated with white faeces disease outbreaks in Pacific white-leg shrimp Penaeus vannamei aquaculture. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11980. PMC: 7371890. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68891-6. View