» Articles » PMID: 37856464

Parent-reported Child's Close Contact with Non-household Family Members and Their Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Oct 19
PMID 37856464
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In England (UK), at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic the public were required to reduce their physical contacts to slow the spread of COVID-19. We investigated the factors associated with children having: 1) close contact with family members from outside their household ('non-adherent behaviour'); and 2) low well-being (Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale). We conducted an online cross-sectional survey, completed at any location of the participant's choice between 8 and 11 June 2020 in parents (n = 2,010) who were aged eighteen years or over and had a school-aged child (4-18 years old). Parents reported that 15% (n = 309) of children had non-adherent contact and that 26% (n = 519) had low well-being. We used a series of binary logistic regressions to investigate associations between outcomes and child and parent characteristics. Children had higher odds of having non-household contact when they had special educational needs [adjusted odds ratio, 2.19 (95% CI, 1.47 to 3.27)], lower well-being [2.65 (95% CI, 2.03 to 3.46)], were vulnerable to COVID-19 [2.17 (95% CI, 1.45 to 3.25)], lived with someone who was over 70 years old [2.56 (95% CI, 1.55 to 4.24)] and their parent had low well-being [1.94 (95% CI, 1.45 to 2.58)]. Children had higher odds of lower well-being when they had special educational needs [4.13 (95% CI, 2.90 to 5.87)], were vulnerable to COVID-19 [3.06 (95% CI, 2.15 to 4.36)], lived with someone else who was vulnerable to COVID-19 [2.08 (95% CI, 1.64 to 2.64)], or lived with someone who was over 70 years old [2.41 (95% CI, 1.51 to 3.83)]. Many children came into contact with non-household family members, mainly for childcare. Factors relating to COVID-19, children's well-being and education were also important. If school closures are needed in future, addressing these issues may help reduce contact.

References
1.
Ahn S, Fedewa A . A meta-analysis of the relationship between children's physical activity and mental health. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011; 36(4):385-97. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq107. View

2.
Wicke F, Krakau L, Lowe B, Beutel M, Brahler E . Update of the standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2022; 312:310-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.054. View

3.
Gentili D, Bardin A, Ros E, Piovesan C, Ramigni M, Dalmanzio M . Impact of Communication Measures Implemented During a School Tuberculosis Outbreak on Risk Perception among Parents and School Staff, Italy, 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(3). PMC: 7037209. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030911. View

4.
Morina N, Kip A, Hoppen T, Priebe S, Meyer T . Potential impact of physical distancing on physical and mental health: a rapid narrative umbrella review of meta-analyses on the link between social connection and health. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3):e042335. PMC: 7978290. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042335. View

5.
Wille N, Bettge S, Ravens-Sieberer U . Risk and protective factors for children's and adolescents' mental health: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 17 Suppl 1:133-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-008-1015-y. View