» Articles » PMID: 37852793

Dynamic Changes in Local Activity and Network Interactions Among the Anterior Cingulate, Amygdala, and Cerebellum During Associative Learning

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Oct 18
PMID 37852793
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Communication between the cerebellum and forebrain structures is necessary for motor learning and has been implicated in a variety of cognitive functions. The exact nature of cerebellar-forebrain interactions supporting behavior and cognition is not known. We examined how local and network activity support learning by simultaneously recording neural activity in the cerebellum, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex while male and female rats were trained in trace eyeblink conditioning. Initially, the cerebellum and forebrain signal the contingency between external stimuli through increases in theta power and synchrony. Neuronal activity driving expression of the learned response was observed in the cerebellum and became evident in the anterior cingulate and amygdala as learning progressed. Aligning neural activity to the training stimuli or learned response provided a way to differentiate between learning-related activity driven by different mechanisms. Stimulus and response-related increases in theta power and coherence were observed across all three areas throughout learning. However, increases in slow gamma power and coherence were only observed when oscillations were aligned to the cerebellum-driven learned response. Percentage of learned responses, learning-related local activity, and slow gamma communication from cerebellum to forebrain all progressively increased during training. The relatively fast frequency of slow gamma provides an ideal mechanism for the cerebellum to communicate learned temporal information to the forebrain. This cerebellar response-aligned slow gamma then provides enrichment of behavior-specific temporal information to local neuronal activity in the forebrain. These dynamic network interactions likely support a wide range of behaviors and cognitive tasks that require coordination between the forebrain and cerebellum. This study presents new evidence for how dynamic learning-related changes in single neurons and neural oscillations in a cerebellar-forebrain network support associative motor learning. The current results provide an integrated mechanism for how bidirectional communication between the cerebellum and forebrain represents important external events and internal neural drive. This bidirectional communication between the cerebellum and forebrain likely supports a wide range of behaviors and cognitive tasks that require temporal precision.

Citing Articles

Meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA): a new method for enhanced precision in fMRI connectivity analysis.

Cauda F, Manuello J, Crocetta A, Duca S, Costa T, Liloia D Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 230(1):17.

PMID: 39718568 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02867-4.


Coincident development and synchronization of sleep-dependent delta in the cortex and medulla.

Ahmad M, Kim J, Dwyer B, Sokoloff G, Blumberg M Curr Biol. 2024; 34(12):2570-2579.e5.

PMID: 38772363 PMC: 11187663. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.064.


Potentiation of the depressant effect of alcohol by flunitrazepam in rats: an electrocorticographic, respiratory and electrocardiographic study.

Freitas L, Amaral A, Conceicao R, Barbosa G, Hamoy M, Barbosa A Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024; 397(10):7599-7613.

PMID: 38676788 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03111-w.


DELTA-RHYTHMIC ACTIVITY IN THE MEDULLA DEVELOPS COINCIDENT WITH CORTICAL DELTA IN SLEEPING INFANT RATS.

Ahmad M, Kim J, Dwyer B, Sokoloff G, Blumberg M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38168267 PMC: 10760077. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.16.572000.

References
1.
Freeman Jr J, Halverson H, Poremba A . Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(4):889-95. PMC: 1249522. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4534-04.2005. View

2.
Lisman J, Jensen O . The θ-γ neural code. Neuron. 2013; 77(6):1002-16. PMC: 3648857. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007. View

3.
Cavanagh J, Frank M . Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(8):414-21. PMC: 4112145. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012. View

4.
Fries P . Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009; 32:209-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603. View

5.
Halverson H, Lee I, Freeman J . Associative plasticity in the medial auditory thalamus and cerebellar interpositus nucleus during eyeblink conditioning. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(26):8787-96. PMC: 2914487. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-10.2010. View