» Articles » PMID: 37851574

Somatic Structural Variation Signatures in Pediatric Brain Tumors

Overview
Journal Cell Rep
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2023 Oct 18
PMID 37851574
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brain cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in children. Somatic structural variations (SVs), large-scale alterations in DNA, remain poorly understood in pediatric brain tumors. Here, we detect a total of 13,199 high-confidence somatic SVs in 744 whole-genome sequences of pediatric brain tumors from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas. The somatic SV occurrences have tremendous diversity among the cohort and across different tumor types. We decompose mutational signatures of clustered complex SVs, non-clustered complex SVs, and simple SVs separately to infer their mutational mechanisms. Our finding of many tumor types carrying unique sets of SV signatures suggests that distinct molecular mechanisms shape genome instability in different tumor types. The patterns of somatic SV signatures in pediatric brain tumors are substantially different from those in adult cancers. The convergence of multiple SV signatures on several major cancer driver genes implies vital roles of somatic SVs in disease progression.

Citing Articles

Somatic DNA Variants in Epilepsy Surgery Brain Samples from Patients with Lesional Epilepsy.

Schwarz J, Becker L, Wahle M, Fassbender J, Thomale U, Tietze A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2.

PMID: 39859528 PMC: 11766355. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020815.


Complex structural variation is prevalent and highly pathogenic in pediatric solid tumors.

van Belzen I, van Tuil M, Badloe S, Janse A, Verwiel E, Santoso M Cell Genom. 2024; 4(11):100675.

PMID: 39406233 PMC: 11605687. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100675.


A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.

Ma W, Tang W, Kwok J, Tong A, Lo C, Chu A Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:954-971.

PMID: 38385061 PMC: 10879706. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.01.024.

References
1.
Degasperi A, Zou X, Amarante T, Martinez-Martinez A, Koh G, Dias J . Substitution mutational signatures in whole-genome-sequenced cancers in the UK population. Science. 2022; 376(6591. PMC: 7613262. DOI: 10.1126/science.abl9283. View

2.
Shoshani O, Brunner S, Yaeger R, Ly P, Nechemia-Arbely Y, Kim D . Chromothripsis drives the evolution of gene amplification in cancer. Nature. 2020; 591(7848):137-141. PMC: 7933129. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03064-z. View

3.
Jones D, Hutter B, Jager N, Korshunov A, Kool M, Warnatz H . Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(8):927-32. PMC: 3951336. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2682. View

4.
Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord C, Tutt A, Johnson D, Richardson T . Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005; 434(7035):917-21. DOI: 10.1038/nature03445. View

5.
Fong P, Boss D, Yap T, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M . Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(2):123-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900212. View