» Articles » PMID: 37842692

Simultaneity of Consciousness with Physical Reality: the Key That Unlocks the Mind-matter Problem

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Oct 16
PMID 37842692
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The problem of explaining the relationship between subjective experience and physical reality remains difficult and unresolved. In most explanations, consciousness is epiphenomenal, without causal power. The most notable exception is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides a causal explanation for consciousness. However, IIT relies on an identity between subjectivity and a particular type of physical structure, namely with an information structure that has intrinsic causal power greater than the sum of its parts. Any theory that relies on a psycho-phyiscal identity must eventually appeal to panpsychism, which undermines that theory's claim to be fundamental. IIT has recently pivoted towards a strong version of causal emergence, but macroscopic structures cannot be stronger causally than their microphysical parts without some new physical law or governing principle. The approach taken here is designed to uncover such a principle. The decisive argument is entirely deductive from initial premises that are phenomenologically certain. If correct, the arguments prove that conscious experience is sufficient to create additional degrees of causal freedom independently of the content of experience, and in a manner that is unpredictable and unobservable by any temporally sequential means. This provides a fundamental principle about consciousness, and a conceptual bridge between it and the physics describing what is experienced. The principle makes testable predictions about brain function, with notable differences from IIT, some of which are also empirically testable.

Citing Articles

Conscious Causality, Observer-Observed Simultaneity, and the Problem of Time for Integrated Information Theory.

Sanfey J Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(8).

PMID: 39202117 PMC: 11353450. DOI: 10.3390/e26080647.


The hidden structure of consciousness.

Forti B Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1344033.

PMID: 38650907 PMC: 11033517. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1344033.


Approaching the nature of consciousness through a phenomenal analysis of early vision. What is the explanandum?.

Forti B Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1329259.

PMID: 38562232 PMC: 10982490. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329259.

References
1.
Tegmark M . Improved Measures of Integrated Information. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016; 12(11):e1005123. PMC: 5117999. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123. View

2.
de Graaf T, Hsieh P, Sack A . The 'correlates' in neural correlates of consciousness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):191-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.012. View

3.
Edelman G . Naturalizing consciousness: a theoretical framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(9):5520-4. PMC: 154377. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0931349100. View

4.
Sahu S, Ghosh S, Ghosh B, Aswani K, Hirata K, Fujita D . Atomic water channel controlling remarkable properties of a single brain microtubule: correlating single protein to its supramolecular assembly. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013; 47:141-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.02.050. View

5.
Kitchener P, Hales C . What Neuroscientists Think, and Don't Think, About Consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:767612. PMC: 8907974. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.767612. View