» Articles » PMID: 37842601

Impact of Banking Development and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Sustainability in Germany: Novel Findings Using the Bootstrap ARDL Approach

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Oct 16
PMID 37842601
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examines the effects of banking development, economic growth and consumption of renewable energy on carbon dioxide (CO) emissions and load capacity factor (LCF). Previous empirical studies have assessed the interrelationship between banking development and CO emissions; however, these studies have ignored supply-side ecological issues. To overcome this issue, this study evaluates the effect of banking development on LCF, which is considered to be one of the most comprehensive ecological proxies to date, including both biocapacity and ecological footprint (EF). Using the bootstrap autoregressive distributed lag model, the study reveals that renewable energy improves ecological quality in Germany. The results of the investigation demonstrate that the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis is valid in Germany using CO emissions and LCF indicators. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that banking growth and renewable energy in Germany correlate with improved environmental quality. These findings provide policymakers with important insights. In this context, the study advises the banking industry and government authorities to leverage banking expansion to support green energy to achieve the national goal of zero CO emissions by 2045.

References
1.
DOrazio P, Dirks M . Exploring the effects of climate-related financial policies on carbon emissions in G20 countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(5):7678-7702. PMC: 8763760. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15655-y. View

2.
Ganda F . The nexus of financial development, natural resource rents, technological innovation, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, human capital, and trade on environmental degradation in the new BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(49):74442-74457. PMC: 9550782. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20976-7. View

3.
Awosusi A, Kutlay K, Altuntas M, Khodjiev B, Agyekum E, Shouran M . A Roadmap toward Achieving Sustainable Environment: Evaluating the Impact of Technological Innovation and Globalization on Load Capacity Factor. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6). PMC: 8950748. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063288. View

4.
Wang Z, Gao L, Wei Z, Majeed A, Alam I . How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO emissions in high-tech industries: evidence from province-level data of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(3):4641-4653. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15946-4. View

5.
Furkan H, Rakibul Hasan K, Uddin M . Greenhouse gas emission, GDP, tertiary education, and rule of law: A comparative study between high-income and lower-middle income countries. Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e16265. PMC: 10220376. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16265. View