Structural Enrichment for Laboratory Mice: Exploring the Effects of Novelty and Complexity

Overview

Journal Front Vet Sci

Specialty Veterinary Medicine

Date 2023 Oct 16

PMID 37841462

Authors

Lena Bohn

Louisa Bierbaum

Niklas Kastner

Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch

Sylvia Kaiser

Norbert Sachser

S Helene Richter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Providing structural enrichment is a widespread refinement method for laboratory rodents and other animals in captivity. So far, animal welfare research has mostly focused on the effect of increased complexity either by accumulating or combining different enrichment items. However, increasing complexity is not the only possibility to refine housing conditions. Another refinement option is to increase novelty by regularly exchanging known enrichment items with new ones. In the present study, we used pair-housed non-breeding female C57BL/6J and DBA/2N mice to investigate the effect of novelty when applying structural enrichment. We used a double cage system, in which one cage served as home cage and the other as extra cage. While the home cage was furnished in the same way for all mice, in the extra cage we either provided only space with no additional enrichment items (space), a fixed set of enrichment items (complexity), or a changing set of enrichment items (novelty). Over 5 weeks, we assessed spontaneous behaviors, body weight, and extra cage usage as indicators of welfare and preference. Our main results showed that mice with access to structurally enriched extra cages (complexity and novelty) spent more time in their extra cages and complexity mice had lower latencies to enter their extra cages than mice with access to the extra cages without any structural enrichment (space). This indicates that the mice preferred the structurally enriched extra cages over the structurally non-enriched space cages. We found only one statistically significant difference between the novelty and complexity condition: during week 3, novelty mice spent more time in their extra cages than complexity mice. Although we did not detect any other significant differences between the novelty and complexity condition in the present study, more research is required to further explore the potential benefits of novelty beyond complexity.

Citing Articles

A Scoping Review of Preclinical Environmental Enrichment Protocols in Models of Poststroke to Set the Foundations for Translating the Paradigm to Clinical Settings.

Oppici L, Berzina G, Hestetun-Mandrup A, Lovstad M, Opheim A, Pacheco M Transl Stroke Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39913056 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-025-01335-3.

Lockbox enrichment facilitates manipulative and cognitive activities for mice.

Hohlbaum K, Andresen N, Mieske P, Kahnau P, Lang B, Diederich K Open Res Eur. 2024; 4:108.

PMID: 39257918 PMC: 11384198. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.17624.2.

Voluntary Wheel Running an Effective Intervention in the Management of Excessive Food Usage in CD-1 Mice ().

Skurnack A, Lane S, Garman L, Burke A, Williams W, Budda M J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39142812 PMC: 11467874. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-040.

Environmental enrichment: a systematic review on the effect of a changing spatial complexity on hippocampal neurogenesis and plasticity in rodents, with considerations for translation to urban and built environments for humans.

Khalil M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1368411.

PMID: 38919908 PMC: 11196820. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1368411.

References

Marashi V, Barnekow A, Sachser N . Effects of environmental enrichment on males of a docile inbred strain of mice. Physiol Behav. 2004; 82(5):765-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.009. View

Olsson I, Dahlborn K . Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of "environmental enrichment". Lab Anim. 2002; 36(3):243-70. DOI: 10.1258/002367702320162379. View

Korholz J, Zocher S, Grzyb A, Morisse B, Poetzsch A, Ehret F . Selective increases in inter-individual variability in response to environmental enrichment in female mice. Elife. 2018; 7. PMC: 6203437. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.35690. View

Baumans V . Science-based assessment of animal welfare: laboratory animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2005; 24(2):503-13. View

Mo C, Renoir T, Hannan A . What's wrong with my mouse cage? Methodological considerations for modeling lifestyle factors and gene-environment interactions in mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2015; 265:99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.008. View

Benaroya-Milshtein N, Hollander N, Apter A, Kukulansky T, Raz N, Wilf A . Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 20(5):1341-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03587.x. View

van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage F . Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 1(3):191-8. DOI: 10.1038/35044558. View

van de Weerd H, Baumans V, Koolhaas J, van Zutphen L . Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. J Exp Anim Sci. 1994; 36(4-5):117-27. View

Walker M, Fureix C, Palme R, Newman J, Dallaire J, Mason G . Mixed-strain housing for female C57BL/6, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice: validating a split-plot design that promotes refinement and reduction. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:11. PMC: 4729181. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0113-7. View

10.

Bailoo J, Murphy E, Boada-Sana M, Varholick J, Hintze S, Baussiere C . Effects of Cage Enrichment on Behavior, Welfare and Outcome Variability in Female Mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:232. PMC: 6212514. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00232. View

11.

Jennings M, Batchelor G, Brain P, Dick A, Elliott H, Francis R . Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Lab Anim. 1998; 32(3):233-59. DOI: 10.1258/002367798780559301. View

12.

Kempermann G, Lopes J, Zocher S, Schilling S, Ehret F, Garthe A . The individuality paradigm: Automated longitudinal activity tracking of large cohorts of genetically identical mice in an enriched environment. Neurobiol Dis. 2022; 175:105916. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105916. View

13.

Walker M, Fureix C, Palme R, Mason G . Co-housing rodents with different coat colours as a simple, non-invasive means of individual identification: validating mixed-strain housing for C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e77541. PMC: 3810273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077541. View

14.

Kozorovitskiy Y, Gross C, Kopil C, Battaglia L, McBreen M, Stranahan A . Experience induces structural and biochemical changes in the adult primate brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(48):17478-82. PMC: 1297690. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508817102. View

15.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

16.

Chapillon P, Manneche C, Belzung C, Caston J . Rearing environmental enrichment in two inbred strains of mice: 1. Effects on emotional reactivity. Behav Genet. 1999; 29(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021437905913. View

17.

van de Weerd H, Ison S . Providing Effective Environmental Enrichment to Pigs: How Far Have We Come?. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(5). PMC: 6562439. DOI: 10.3390/ani9050254. View

18.

Hutchinson E, Avery A, VandeWoude S . Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR J. 2005; 46(2):148-61. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.46.2.148. View

19.

Tam W, Cheung K . Phenotypic characteristics of commonly used inbred mouse strains. J Mol Med (Berl). 2020; 98(9):1215-1234. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-020-01953-4. View

20.

Ahloy-Dallaire J, Espinosa J, Mason G . Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states?. Behav Processes. 2017; 156:3-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.011. View