Neural Responses to Natural and Enhanced Speech Edges in Children with and Without Dyslexia

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Oct 16

PMID 37841072

Authors

Kanad Mandke

Sheila Flanagan

Annabel Macfarlane

Georgia Feltham

Fiona Gabrielczyk

Angela M Wilson

Joachim Gross

Usha Goswami

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Sensory-neural studies indicate that children with developmental dyslexia show impairments in processing acoustic speech envelope information. Prior studies suggest that this arises in part from reduced sensory sensitivity to amplitude rise times (ARTs or speech "edges") in the envelope, accompanied by less accurate neural encoding of low-frequency envelope information. Accordingly, enhancing these characteristics of the speech envelope may enhance neural speech processing in children with dyslexia. Here we applied an envelope modulation enhancement (EME) algorithm to a 10-min story read in child-directed speech (CDS), enhancing ARTs and also enhancing low-frequency envelope information. We compared neural speech processing (as measured using MEG) for the EME story with the same story read in natural CDS for 9-year-old children with and without dyslexia. The EME story affected neural processing in the power domain for children with dyslexia, particularly in the delta band (0.5-4 Hz) in the superior temporal gyrus. This may suggest that prolonged experience with EME speech could ameliorate some of the impairments shown in natural speech processing by children with dyslexia.

Citing Articles

Infant low-frequency EEG cortical power, cortical tracking and phase-amplitude coupling predicts language a year later.

Attaheri A, Ni Choisdealbha A, Rocha S, Brusini P, Di Liberto G, Mead N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313274.

PMID: 39636849 PMC: 11620356. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313274.

Anatomical and behavioural correlates of auditory perception in developmental dyslexia.

Qi T, Mandelli M, Watson Pereira C, Wellman E, Bogley R, Licata A Brain. 2024; 148(3):833-844.

PMID: 39300826 PMC: 11884757. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae298.

Atypical low-frequency cortical encoding of speech identifies children with developmental dyslexia.

Araujo J, Simons B, Peter V, Mandke K, Kalashnikova M, Macfarlane A Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1403677.

PMID: 38911229 PMC: 11190370. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1403677.

References

Gross J, Hoogenboom N, Thut G, Schyns P, Panzeri S, Belin P . Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biol. 2014; 11(12):e1001752. PMC: 3876971. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752. View

Kalashnikova M, Goswami U, Burnham D . Mothers speak differently to infants at-risk for dyslexia. Dev Sci. 2016; 21(1). DOI: 10.1111/desc.12487. View

Kalashnikova M, Goswami U, Burnham D . Sensitivity to amplitude envelope rise time in infancy and vocabulary development at 3 years: A significant relationship. Dev Sci. 2019; 22(6):e12836. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12836. View

Leong V, Goswami U . Acoustic-Emergent Phonology in the Amplitude Envelope of Child-Directed Speech. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0144411. PMC: 4671555. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144411. View

Ho J, Tumkaya T, Aryal S, Choi H, Claridge-Chang A . Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics. Nat Methods. 2019; 16(7):565-566. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3. View

Lizarazu M, Scotto di Covella L, van Wassenhove V, Riviere D, Mizzi R, Lehongre K . Neural entrainment to speech and nonspeech in dyslexia: Conceptual replication and extension of previous investigations. Cortex. 2021; 137:160-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.024. View

Corriveau K, Goswami U, Thomson J . Auditory processing and early literacy skills in a preschool and kindergarten population. J Learn Disabil. 2010; 43(4):369-82. DOI: 10.1177/0022219410369071. View

Hamalainen J, Rupp A, Soltesz F, Szucs D, Goswami U . Reduced phase locking to slow amplitude modulation in adults with dyslexia: an MEG study. Neuroimage. 2011; 59(3):2952-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.075. View

PLOMP R, MIMPEN A . Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology. 1979; 18(1):43-52. DOI: 10.3109/00206097909072618. View

10.

Peter V, Goswami U, Burnham D, Kalashnikova M . Impaired neural entrainment to low frequency amplitude modulations in English-speaking children with dyslexia or dyslexia and DLD. Brain Lang. 2022; 236:105217. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105217. View

11.

Destoky F, Bertels J, Niesen M, Wens V, Vander Ghinst M, Leybaert J . Cortical tracking of speech in noise accounts for reading strategies in children. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(8):e3000840. PMC: 7478533. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000840. View

12.

Destoky F, Bertels J, Niesen M, Wens V, Vander Ghinst M, Rovai A . The role of reading experience in atypical cortical tracking of speech and speech-in-noise in dyslexia. Neuroimage. 2022; 253:119061. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119061. View

13.

Di Liberto G, Peter V, Kalashnikova M, Goswami U, Burnham D, Lalor E . Atypical cortical entrainment to speech in the right hemisphere underpins phonemic deficits in dyslexia. Neuroimage. 2018; 175:70-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.072. View

14.

Lizarazu M, Lallier M, Bourguignon M, Carreiras M, Molinaro N . Impaired neural response to speech edges in dyslexia. Cortex. 2021; 135:207-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.033. View

15.

Huang M, Mosher J, Leahy R . A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44(2):423-40. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010. View

16.

Goswami U . A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 15(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.001. View

17.

Thiede A, Glerean E, Kujala T, Parkkonen L . Atypical MEG inter-subject correlation during listening to continuous natural speech in dyslexia. Neuroimage. 2020; 216:116799. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116799. View

18.

Law J, Wouters J, Ghesquiere P . The influences and outcomes of phonological awareness: a study of MA, PA and auditory processing in pre-readers with a family risk of dyslexia. Dev Sci. 2016; 20(5). DOI: 10.1111/desc.12453. View

19.

Moore B, Glasberg B, Varathanathan A, Schlittenlacher J . A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition. Trends Hear. 2017; 20:2331216516682698. PMC: 5318944. DOI: 10.1177/2331216516682698. View

20.

Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher J, Pantazis D, Leahy R . Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:879716. PMC: 3090754. DOI: 10.1155/2011/879716. View